Collision Resistance@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoUS grows doubtful Ukraine counteroffensive can quickly succeed. Criticism of Kyiv’s strategy from American officials widens rift between allies at crucial time.www.ft.comexternal-linkmessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down149file-text
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkUS grows doubtful Ukraine counteroffensive can quickly succeed. Criticism of Kyiv’s strategy from American officials widens rift between allies at crucial time.www.ft.comCollision Resistance@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square58fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBenderOver@artemis.camplinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down3·2 years agoWhy is this a Imgur link lol?
minus-squareloathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·2 years agoFT is extremely paywalled
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 years agoBecause FT are paywalled cunts.
minus-squareawwwyissss@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down6·2 years agoAre you upset that they want to get paid for the content they create?
minus-squareOoops@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoNo, just insulting a shitty publication for being a shitty publication. But their paying bubble probably loves them for being relentlessly pushing the same same bullshit they love to hear…
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-22 years agoI’m not upset, I’m just explaining OP posted a screen capture.
minus-squarePseu@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·2 years agoIf you’re not upset, why’d you call them cunts?
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 years agoIt’s the financial times. I feel their cuntitude doesn’t need much elaboration.
minus-squareawwwyissss@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoThat’s probably where my confusion comes in, I’m not familiar with them.
Why is this a Imgur link lol?
FT is extremely paywalled
Because FT are paywalled cunts.
Are you upset that they want to get paid for the content they create?
No, just insulting a shitty publication for being a shitty publication. But their paying bubble probably loves them for being relentlessly pushing the same same bullshit they love to hear…
I’m not upset, I’m just explaining OP posted a screen capture.
If you’re not upset, why’d you call them cunts?
It’s the financial times. I feel their cuntitude doesn’t need much elaboration.
That’s probably where my confusion comes in, I’m not familiar with them.