• kick_out_the_jams@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    . So Gaza doesn’t become all at Bibi’s mercy.

    So you think that would be different from what is happening now.

    Do you think holding more hostages would make a difference?

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Having hostages gives Gaza slightly more hope for when the war ends. And not surrendering means they can at least prevent Israel from occupying all of Gaza.

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Serious question, without trying to stir shit up:

        Other than international outrage or intervention what would prevent Israel from occupying all of Gaza? Doesn’t Israel outnumber 20:1 in terms of population, and outgun 2024 to 1970 in terms of technology?

        • wewbull@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Other than international outrage or intervention what would prevent Israel from occupying all of Gaza?

          Having an iota of humanity In their souls.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They outnumber them 3:1, but that aside: Guerilla warfare, probably. No matter how technologically advanced you are, it’s very hard to occupy a population that doesn’t want you there, so it’d depend on how long the West is willing to fund Israel’s Afghanistan.