LX Pontual
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
intelshill@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago

NATO Proposes $100 Billion, Five-Year Fund to Aid Ukraine

www.bloomberg.com

external-link
message-square
267
fedilink
539
external-link

NATO Proposes $100 Billion, Five-Year Fund to Aid Ukraine

www.bloomberg.com

intelshill@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago
message-square
267
fedilink
NATO Proposes $100 Billion, Five-Year Fund to Support Ukraine
www.bloomberg.com
external-link
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg is proposing to establish a fund of allied contributions worth $100 billion over five years for Ukraine as part of a package for alliance leaders to sign off when they gather in Washington in July.
  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ukraine would have more territory

    How would Ukraine have more territory when the reason Putin said he needed to invade was to take territory away from Ukraine to protect ethnic Russians?

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because they would have had a peace deal back in 2022, and that peace deal was with more territory than Ukraine currently has, and Ukraine was also in a better negotiating position.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That isn’t true. The peace deal left eastern Ukraine undecided.

        https://www.wsj.com/world/russia-ukraine-peace-deal-2022-document-6e12e093

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I looked at the exact peace lines it was going to be at, and the lines were better back then than they are right now.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Any maps did not include Russian claims to eastern Ukraine because that wasn’t part of the peace plan. Ukraine was to disarm and then Russia would decide how much of Eastern Ukraine was taken.

            I already linked the article.

            Furthermore, Russia had already violated the 1994 non aggression agreement

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#:~:text=The Declaration of State Sovereignty,non-nuclear-weapon state.

            So Russia could not be trusted to not invade again.

            US aid to Ukraine is required by the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The peace deal was borders to a paticular day of the war. I already looked at is and saw the result, I am not going to re-research it.

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                And I linked proof that what you remember is wrong.

                “The future of Ukraine’s east, part of which was occupied by Russia in 2014, was not included in the draft, leaving the issue for a personal discussion between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who never held a meeting.”

                https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/03/1/7444515/

                “recognition of the Donetsk People’s Republic and Luhansk People’s Republic as independent states,”

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_negotiations_in_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine#:~:text=In negotiations during March and,guarantees from its European allies.

                Any maps showed only the Ukrainian territory that Putin said was non negotiable but left eastern Ukraine undecided.

                So Ukraine was to disarm, then Putin would decide how much of Eastern Ukraine Russia would take.

                And again, Russia already violated the Budapest Memorandum.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You can repeat what you keep saying, but the eastern providences were always going to be gone.

                  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Then your claim that Ukraine would have had more territory if they took Russia’s 2022 peace plan is false.

World News@lemmy.ml

worldnews@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 656 users / day
  • 1.86K users / week
  • 4.83K users / month
  • 13.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 35.8K subscribers
  • 12K Posts
  • 112K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • Jack.@lemmy.ml
  • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org