return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1387arrow-down115
arrow-up1372arrow-down1external-linkForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squareZaktor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoYeah, but the CEO personally profits from RTO, while the company profits from reducing their office footprint. Easy choice. He’s not loyal to the company and neither should @[email protected] be.
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIf the company is publically traded, shareholders could sue over that conflict of interest.
Yeah, but the CEO personally profits from RTO, while the company profits from reducing their office footprint. Easy choice. He’s not loyal to the company and neither should @[email protected] be.
If the company is publically traded, shareholders could sue over that conflict of interest.