What if charging your phone took less time than brushing your teeth? A new study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences could very well hold the key to a next-gen charger capable of recharging your phone in just 60 seconds.

Researchers from the University of Colorado Boulder have discovered a new cutting-edge technique that could make it possible to charge devices almost instantaneously. This would make charging phones, laptops, and even electric cars much more efficient and convenient. The foundation of the new technique is based on new insights into how ions move through supercapacitors.

The key, one of the researchers explains in a press release, is to make the movement of the ions more efficient. By doing this we can make the charging and release of energy much faster, allowing for that next-gen charger that is capable of boosting your phone’s charge from 0 to 100 in just a minute, or maybe even less.

To make this discovery, the researchers looked at the movement of ions through a complex network of interconnected pores running through the supercapacitor. Their findings have helped modify a scientific law that researchers have used to govern electrical currents for more than 175 years. This law, called the Kirchhoff circuit law, describes the flow of electrons in a simple loop of wiring in most classes.

However, when inspecting the ions and their movement, the researchers found that the ions move fundamentally differently at the intersections of tiny nanoscale pores when compared to how electrons move near the same locations. Further observations helped them determine that these movements are different from what Kirchhoff’s law describes. This doesn’t completely throw out the old laws, though, as they still provide valid explanations for how electronics flow within conventional electronic circuits.

However, to create a next-gen charger capable of taking full advantage of the movements of the ions, we have to look at things different. This, the researchers say, is “the missing link” that they have been looking for. Creating more efficient energy storage has been a long-term goal for many engineers.

We’ve seen water-based batteries capable of storing more than traditional lithium-ion batteries. Still, a method that lets us charge our batteries almost instantly would remove a lot of the hindrances surrounding the wider adoption of things like electric cars. Not to mention how much more convenient a next-gen character would make charging laptops, phones, and other electronic devices.

  • Thevenin@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, no. This is not about chargers or batteries or phones or cars. This study is about improved charge/discharge rates for supercapacitors.

    Supercaps have very high flow rate, but extremely low capacity. Put them in a phone or a car and it would run very fast for five minutes. Supercaps are useful, don’t get me wrong, but they’re not batteries.

    Very cool research from UC Boulder, but the journalism leans way too far into clickbait.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      The bigger issue I would see is the heat created from dumping all that energy in at once. And can a US outlet even provide that much power?

      • Thevenin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Solid point. A laptop battery is around 60Wh, and charging that in 1 minute would pull 3.6kW from the outlet, or roughly double what a US residential outlet can deliver.

        Supercaps stay pretty cool under high current charging/discharging, but your laptop would have to be the size of a mini fridge.

        The research paper itself was only talking about using the tech for wearable electronics, which tend to be tiny. The article probably made the cars-and-phones connection for SEO. Good tech, bad journalism.

      • brie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Increasing capacitance (how much charge is stored to reach a certain voltage) or the voltage it is charged to would indeed increase the capacity. Putting several in parallel would work, as would making a bigger capacitor. The main problem as far as I can tell is that the energy density of even supercapacitors is low, so you’d need a much larger volume to have the same capacity (and thus a much thicker phone).

          • Thevenin@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah, this matches my experience.

            A supercapacitor buffer will cost around twice as much and deliver around 1/10th the watt-hours of a similarly-sized lead acid battery. And lead acid isn’t exactly great to begin with.

            Capacitors are useful, but only in applications where the total amount of energy stored is more-or-less unimportant.

      • sleepybisexual@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, yea. Tho it would be cool to be able to slow charging down in software, I wanna sleep while charging without overcharge

        • ultratiem@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          That is another matter altogether. Apple has that feature that limits the charge to 80%. Easily done. In fact, as we move to AI, we can create much more intelligent charging schemes that can be tailored to the user.

          But when it comes to actual charge times, obviously less is better. Not sure why anyone in their right mind would get upset over lower times and claim that things are fine now. It’s like fighting against electricity because you love your typewriter.

          • sleepybisexual@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yea, tho, with fast charging like this. My single 33w charger already makes devices hot, this could cause that too

        • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          That exists. It’s called adaptive charging. If you have a modern Pixel: Just set an alarm before plugging the phone in, and it will slow the charge to hit 100% when the alarm goes off. I don’t know what other phones have this feature but I’m pretty sure it’s just part of Android 14 if the hardware is compatible.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Consider that the energy output of a 12-gauge shotgun is approximately 4500 Newton-meters and, from personal experience, can rotate a first-gen iPad at an extrapolated 240 rpm (extrapolated as this proved difficult to sustain). That gives us an equivalent of 113 kW! A modern ipad would only need about 13 kW to charge in one second.

      So, one shotgun shell could easily charge yours and 7 of your friends ipads instantaneously, although the results are difficult to appreciate.

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        probably because they currently don’t get stuffed a bucketload of crackly juice* in 60 seconds

        *I don’t, in fact, know how electricity really works

        • Icalasari@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          More like, “Shoving it in so fast it makes the sauce in the battery super heat and create a bomb”

      • Skyline969@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Been charging my phone overnight for years. Battery health is 100% and I never have to worry about charging.

        • ColdCreasent@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Impossible for battery health to be at 100% after years. May still be working great, but not 100%.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Battery degradation is ridiculously unpredictable. I’ve seen 100 cycle batteries at 75% and 2500 cycle batteries over 90%. I only dealt with like 5 MacBook models

    • taanegl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      No! Now take this slave labour cobalt and partake in the market place of ideas… I said partake! *shakes fist*

  • Teknikal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Call me skeptical I guess but if you wanted a phone that worked as long as lithium say 5000mah using capacitors I think it would be a dozen times larger at least.

    Maybe I’ve got it wrong and supercapacitors hold more energy or something like that.

    • Baggins@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      From the article

      This would make charging phones, laptops, and even electric cars much more efficient and convenient.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah but I doubt that’s actually the case based on the physics involved. We need fast charging cars way more than fast charging phones.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      So an electric car might hold 100 kWh. To charge that in 1 minute you would need 6000 kW of power, or 6 MW. Typical “rapid” chargers today do 350 kW and these are the kind that are difficult to find. A nuclear plant makes around 1,000 MW so if you had 166 cars charging at once you would overload one.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t understand. Is this a new material, membrane, electrolyte, way to deliver electricity to the battery, or something else entirely? Will this require an internal change to future batteries or something external? Also, is this for Lithium-Ion batteries only or other batteries that use ions too? And finally, how does this impact lifetime of the battery? Fast charging already has impact on batteries for charging in 30 minutes to an hour. The effect of just 60 seconds (a 30 fold increase) could be substantial…

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • brie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The original research was regarding supercapacitors, not Lithium-ion. Based on the PNAS preview it seems it has to do with changing the design of a supercapacitor to increase charge rate.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, never. Current charging rates already get close to thermal constraints. Hitting those charging rates either requires accepting much lower power density or using way more metal per cell. This research might inform design changes to improve charging rates, but we’ll never see high capacity batteries charging in a minute.

      The researchers know this and only mention wearables and iot devices applications. The article author erroneously makes the leap to high power density devices.

      If you don’t care about power density at all, ceramic capacitors can already charge and discharge in microseconds.

      • Hirom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It sounds like this is completely clickbait article, bordering on misinformation.

  • greysemanticist@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    How about two batteries that can be ejected and swapped without powering off the device? We don’t need to wait for super-capacitors today.

    iPhones… someday. :)