• pjhenry1216@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not overly simplistic. It’s simply not a privacy feature if the core functionality is sharing your data. Privacy is if they stopped sharing data. Sharing more data is antithetical to privacy.

    • StudioLE@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The transparency of Topics is at least an improvement. Previously you would be targeted - or rather discriminated - by highly questionable traits.

      Hopefully with this move regulators will finally step in to outlaw the previous behaviour. That would be a minimal step in the right direction.

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I doubt it. And I see no reason to believe Google is not going to continue that behavior, especially for those using a different browser.

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but this is local to your browser and you’ll be able to edit and/or clear it out if you choose.

      It’s not perfect, and I’m aware of which community this is, but this is vastly better than 3rd party cookies.

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You say that as if clearing out cookies isn’t also a thing one can do. All they’re doing is opting you into more directly handing them your data. And I didn’t see any mention that cookies will be discontinued by them anyway.

        In the end, the big problem here is that it’s being routed as a privacy feature when it’s anything but. It’s just a different kind of privacy violation.

        It’s simply not about privacy so it shouldn’t be labeled as such.