I hear many people say that the Google Pixel is good for privacy, but is it?

I’m asking this because I find it weird, of all the companies, Google having the most “privacy”.

  • zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    pixels have the highest hardware security of all Android phones, which increases privacy potential. assuming you keep the stock os and default Google settings, though, it’s about the same as any other.

    Google also has good support for alternative OS’/Android forks, which is likely where that claim is leading to.

  • mintyfrog@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google Pixel has the most support for security, which relates to privacy. It does “phone home,” but likely only to Google. Removing all the Google software and installing GrapheneOS further hardens the security and vastly improves the privacy by stopping the “phoning home.”

    https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah. I thought it was weird, but the stock Pixel is very secure, and if you install Graphene OS, it is even more so. Additionally, Graphene OS sandboxes The Playstore Apps, and gives you much more control over what the Apps you install are allowed access to. You have to go way out of your way to make it less private than the stock OS, and you pretty much can’t make it less secure than the stock OS.

    You can get almost anything that works on the stock Pixel working on Graphene OS except for Google Wallet and the Android drive app. Banking Apps work, Google Apps work (but you might as well try to use alternatives).

    I had an iphone for years, but after using Graphene OS for the past 3 months, I can honestly say I’ll do everything I can to not go back.

  • maudefi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Google Pixel hardware is focused on providing a private relationship between the user (your data and behavioral patterns) and Google.

    Depending on your threat model you can flash custom roms to enhance your privacy and security posture.

    A lot of folks here seem to be of the “…just flash GrapheneOS and you’re good…” crowd but it’s not that simple and there are trade-offs that impact usability and user experience.

    There are a lot of interesting projects out there to choose from. Best advice is to work-up your real world threat model and do your reasearch.

    You may find Louis Rossman’s experience with GrapheneOS relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4To-F6W1NT0&t=1

    Here’s a few links to help get you started - there are many android projects. I am not affiliated nor am I explicitly endorsing any of these projects.

    CalyxOS https://calyxos.org/

    LineageOS https://lineageos.org/

    HavocOS https://havoc-os.com/

    ResurrectionRemix https://resurrectionremix.com/

    DerpFest https://derpfest.org/

    PixelExperience https://wiki.pixelexperience.org/

    GrapheneOS https://grapheneos.org/

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah the developer is very dramatic, but the project itself is still amazing. He did step down from lead, but the dude is a genius programmer. I’m still very confident on having it on my phone. I was using CalyxOS before, which I really like, but the sandboxed play services were a really killer feature for me on GrapheneOS.

  • Platform27@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s one of the better options.

    For a start, even if you run it stock, it’s somewhat on par with the iPhone (depending who you ask). You’re trusting one company with your data, Google. You’re not trusting Google AND Samsung, or Google AND Huawai. It’s just Google. Plus Google does offer good security, so your data/device is pretty secure. In comparison to Samsungs Knox… while better than a lot of other Android security stuff, is kinda bad.

    Though, the real privacy win for the Pixel, is it DOES allow you to modify it. You can remove Google’s version of Android, and change to Calyx or Graphine OS. Both of which are fantastic options, that allow you to really lock things down.

  • jacktherippah@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes, it is. I mean, GrapheneOS is the gold standard for privacy&security, but even stock Pixel is a good step up. Think of it like this: on stock Pixel, only Google is tracking you, not Google + Samsung, or Google + Xiaomi. Just Google. It’s guaranteed to be a step up from all other Android phones, stock or not.

      • dwindling7373@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait since when a monopoly is preferable to a duopoly? As far as I’m concerned if I can’t have 0 companies to spy on me I’d rather have them all fight each others in the data space…

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          In this case they don’t fight, they exploit your data in different ways and if one of the exploiters isn’t arsed to keep your data secure then everyone gets it and it’s not just corporate actors profiting from you but more harmful actors including scammers using your data.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    GrapheneOS on a Pixel 7 is one of the best decisions I ever made. You can sandbox the shit out of all apps and granularly control the permissions in addition to outright cutting off network access to apps that would otherwise be doing background telemetry garbage all the time.

    If you’re terminally online and just can’t imagine life without all the first party Google apps, you’ll disagree with me. But otherwise it is a great decision. F-droid and Aurora Store are awesome. (You can still manually install and use stuff like the Google camera app, Maps and others. Just never sign in to first party G Apps, be careful with your permissions etc. and you’ll retain 90% of the functionality while not having the privacy downsides.)

    • beteljuice@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using LineageOS+MicroG with very little google software (only maps) and it’s been working great. Any reason I should switch to Graphene? I noticed the main dev seemed to have some disputes and interesting personality characteristics, so I was a bit hesitant to adopt. I also had an irrational “I wouldn’t be surprised if 3 letter agencies are involved” vibe about Graphene, but nothing concrete.

      • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The main dev that you are referring to is Daniel Micay, who has been former dev since the chad himself Louis Rossmann called him out for his toxicity back in May. I see GrapheneOS as the most secure, most private (without sandboxed google play), and the most usable privacy focused ROM. However, I should state in the rare instance where MicroG gets by enough and you don’t need actual play services, a ROM like LineageOS or CalyxOS running MicroG will be more private, albeit less secure, than GrapheneOS with sandboxed Google Play.

        Pick your poison.

        They are all solid in my opinion just depends on your use case. But overall I would put GrapheneOS on top.

        • robotdna@toast.ooo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s quite a statement, are you sure about that? The Graphene team has done a considerable amount of work sandboxing the environment of Google Play, both in memory, permission structure, and IO access that MicroG completely blows past. Given how the Graphene sandboxing works, I actually can’t think of a scenario where the statement that MicroG is more private than Graphene sandboxed Google Play. In either scenario you don’t have to log in, so I’d much rather have an environment that has been isolated than tooling that still has tendrils reaching into the main OS itself (MicroG).

      • thayer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gmail will work fine, including push notifications, assuming you enable Google Play Services. Using either will of course come at the cost of privacy.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Install GrapheneOS on it and it will be. Remember, security and privacy are two different things. You can be very secure without being private, and you can be very private without being secure.

    Google Pixels by default are pretty secure, but not private, at least not to Google.

  • hexagonwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pixels get verified boot and bootloader relocking for custom roms like grapheneos as well, so you can be sure your device isn’t compromised even with a privacy respecting custom rom. I guess this is what most people refer to… Oh, and Pixels are probably going to get security patches for the kernel as well as the vendor blobs unlike many other vendors…

  • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d argue yes.

    I see Google as a known unknown, where as various other Chinese phones are unknown unknowns.

    I acknowledge I have western bias, but the propaganda, human rights violations and control of the CCP is well understood.

    At the very least Pixel let’s you flash an alternative OS.

  • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who the actual fuck said this to you? Google is one of the worst companies for privacy.

    I mean i guess with a pixel, you’re just being spied on by Google rather than Samsung + Google if you buy a samsung android, so in that sense, sorta? But saying a pixel is good for privacy in general is an absolutely ridiculous statement.

    • Elektrobank@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty much everyone that knows about privacy focused phones. Ironic that google supplies the only way to avoid google. It will be a sad day when they lock android down.