Could it be this fella who’s hitting you up: https://claude.ai/login
Could it be this fella who’s hitting you up: https://claude.ai/login
Further, most of the times, it’s simply infeasible to test the data in-depth. We’re all humans with busy schedules and it is, unfortunately, not trivial to replicate experiments. If a reviewer feels more data is needed to support a claim, they can ask for a follow-up test or experiment, but it has to be within reason
Is it possible for you to somehow quantify traffic originating from AdNauseum? If so, how?
Could you link some of those studies? I’d be interested to read more about that
But that study was done on people aged 65+ for 11 weeks? I mean, sure, they didn’t measure any significant changes to the brain, but that doesn’t preclude changes forever. 11 weeks is not long to practice a language
When talking about measurements, “precision” and “accuracy” have slightly different meanings See here
Interesting that they have such a greedy/stupid bot