

I don’t think attacking the writer makes your best argument. Can you address the points in the article instead?
From Usenet to MySpace to Facebook to Reddit to Lemmy
I don’t think attacking the writer makes your best argument. Can you address the points in the article instead?
I think the article is trying to say that things “we can’t conclude from not enough evidence” are not science and therefore should not be part of a medical discussion until they are backed by science.
The article also points out that that using the appearance of science when it is not so, and the spinning of science was not accidental.
If paywalled: http://archive.today/ucJ0L
Isreal and Iran saw how much Putin respected a Trump ceasefire
Absolutely. The system has been broken for decades. This is all Congress’ fault.
I’ve been running Pi-Hole on a B since 2018. It has always worked perfectly and is still kicking.
Agree. Yay Read is acquitted but omg something is very rotten in Massachusetts
Or better: Trump administration floats trial balloon
I did this same move two years ago. Make a list of critical must have functions. Get a second storage drive like your current one, swap out the old and install Kubuntu. Get those critical apps installed and tested. Create a virtual machine out of your old primary drive. Boot that inside Linux when needed.
And maybe we can use the same technique for other viruses that “hide” like HSV
Thinking about lunch, it’s 12:15pm here. Getting over a cold for the last few days.
This is exactly what I did. Later I copied my old system to a VM and I boot it up inside Linux when needed.
Search is to Google as F150 is to Ford…anything that threatens it makes the whole thing crumble.
This worked on me, I just became a contributor
Perhaps you can set it aside long enough to see that someone has died.
Great! My cousin and his daughter came over to watch my team win a spot in the national championship.
850 arrests per month just in the UK?! That’s an amazing, maybe incredible figure
I agree that calling something false is no better than true when it isn’t proven