I would drop off the face of the earth only to stash porn mags all over the woods.

Hey. I got lots of good responses without doing anything. Don’t want to jinx it.

What studies? Just fucking link them.

Go on, now. Cya.

From the first link:

One epidemiologic study looked at a population exposed to chloramine in its drinking water and used the disease risk as a baseline for comparing the risk in a population exposed to chlorine in its drinking water. These findings will be addressed only briefly as they are not directly relevant to this document.

Have you looked through the second link? It’s all about EPA methods. If I felt further discussion with you might be productive I might investigate some of the citations. I just think you’re accusing me of one thing and I’m saying something entirely different.

Don’t forget some studies on the benefits

Are you suggesting chlorine is actually good for you, not that it has antibacterial properties that makes the water safer for consumption?

I’ll skip the chlorine safety stuff because I asked for a study.

As far as the toxicity stuff I’m not concerned because you’re still talking about concentration (see. Dilution).

If you had any tact you would understand that I’m not trying to say chlorine is unsafe for human consumption I’m saying that the goal of science isn’t to determine every possible outcome of consuming it.

Anyway. You’ll just have disregard me because we aren’t communicating on the same level.

Again, you’re talking about a dilution. Is a glass of water with trace amount of chlorine, chlorine?

I’d gladly review any study, that you’re aware of, that states there are no longer term effects of drinking trace amounts of chlorine. That is, since it’s such a walk in the park to do.

How exactly would they deploy this if they’re losing money on chatgpt responding to users saying “thank you”?

Billionaires are taking control of any avenue for free speech. Get yourself ready to switch to torr. Won’t be long now until it’s the last place free of misinfo/disinfo campains.

There is nothing inaccurate about stating poison is poison. You’re arguing the poison will not have an effect. That does not mean anything about its chemical structure or toxic properties have changed.

There is a reason the LD50 is listed. It shows a what concentration will kill a species of animal, usually mice. This is not entire analogous to humans but we accept this is the only practice that is maybe acceptable.

We do not test on humans and there is no blind study to show there are no longterm effects of consuming trace amounts of chlorine in water.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Gee, I always thought we spend way to much money on the nuclear arsenal. Glad doge is there to make cuts.

Can’t wait for my check…

I’m a huge advocate for first past the post. I’d love to see it happen in my state.

I know surefire improvements we can make to the way things are now better. I don’t trust anyone with the authority required to force socialism/communism on a hostile populace.

So, I’m actually quite reasoned if you were honest with yourself.

Oh yeah, you’re right. I lost the thread. Don’t mind me, sorry. Im seriously sorry.

Show me how I’m not being proactive enough.

Removed by mod

Lead is probably why right wing media is overtly aggressive.

I think they would morph into whatever if the populace was decidedly more docile.

You miss the point if you try to attribute authoritarianism to one single cause. The dominant force will always try to subvert all others in autocracy.

Christianity, for example, can be anything. You can be a selfless servant of God “spreading the good news” and evangelizing the meek with Christian morality. You can also be a tyrant enacting gods wrath on the soulless heathens.

I was talking about this with my wife. I’d live in a socialist or communist run government, at least the one they fantasize about, but I would never live long enough to see it enacted, as leftists envision.

So in my mind I have two choices that aren’t exactly mutually exclusive:

1.) Openly support communism without thought about what the final outcome of that may actually be because I won’t be alive to guide it (as if I’d have much say).

2.) Just keep working to make the world I live in better

Both are fine options and I can do both but they would have me chose the former and exclude the latter.

I’m just so impressed by them. Forgoing all forms of capitalism so they are not totally responsible for the outcomes of capitalist society. It’s a principled stance but living in stateless, technology absent, collectives outside the rule of the government is not an easy life.

Idgaf about etiquette. Are you only here because trump was rude to the pope?