Our discussion was never about the term factuality. You’ve just now raised that term for the first time in this discussion. You said search engine. They are in fact searching and reconstructing data based on a probabilistic data space.
…and there are plenty of examples of search engines being sued for the types of data they’ve explored or digitized.
…also the inference that search engines are “accurate” or don’t serve up misinformation, and manipulated data is foolish.
No, they’re helping their team mate. The one who gives them tax breaks and deregulates the restrictions on what they can do, with data.
They’re on the same side. Ideology is the lie. Class warfare is the truth.
It’s searched in training, tagged for use/topic then that info is processed and filtered through layers. So it’s pre-searched if you will. Like meta tags in the early internet.
Then the data is processed into cells which queries flow through during generation.
99% of what it generates doesn’t come from anywhere in particular, and you wouldn’t find it in any of the sources which were fed to the model in training.
Yes it does - the fact that you in particular can’t recognize from where it comes: doesn’t matter. It’s still using copywrited works.
Anyways you’re an AI stan, and defending theft. You can deny it all day, but it’s what you’re doing. “It’s okay, I’m a software engineer I’m allowed to defend it”
…as if being a software engineer doesn’t stop you from also being a dumbass. Of course it doesn’t.
“data gathering” and “training data” is just what they’ve tricked you into calling it (just like they tried to trick people into calling it an “intelligence”).
It’s not data gathering, it’s stealing. It’s not training data, it’s our original work.
It’s not creating anything, it’s searching and selectively remixing the human creative work of the internet.
They are. They record the data, stealing it. They search it (or characteristics of it), and reprint it (in whole or in part) upon request.
Viewing it as something creative, or other than a glorified remixing machine is the problem. It’s a search engine for creative works they’ve stolen, and reproduce parts of.
They search the data-space of what they’re “trained” on (our content, the content of human beings), and reproduce statistically defined elements of it.
They’re search engines that have stolen what they’re “trained on”, and reproduce it as “results” (be that images or written text, it has to come from our collective data. Data we created). It’s theft. It’s copywrite fraud. Same as google stealing books (which they had to he sued over the digitizing of, and enter into rights agreements over).
Searching and reproducing content they’ve already recorded (aka stolen without permission), is absolutely part of what they are. Part of what they do.
Don’t stan for them or pretend they’re creative, intelligent, or doing anything original.
The real lie is that it’s “training data”. It’s not. It’s the internet, and it’s not training - it’s theft, it’s stealing and copying (violating copyright). Digital stealing, and processing into a “data set”, a representation or repackaging of our original works.
All the search engines search the same internet, find similar text, output it using similar formulas.
Part of the reason apparently was the venue made demands to have a police perimeter, and the campaign was having trouble find a venue in the area.
Yes, AFTER the fact. But before that, the area was the charge of PA police.
A member of the Butler County ESU then shot at Crooks and hit his rifle, preventing him from firing more shots. Ten seconds later, Crooks was shot and killed by the Counter Sniper Team of the United States Secret Service.[13]
That wasn’t the secret service, it was the PA police. But sure roll up and take your shot already if you think it’s easy.
Inches count. How’d the shooter fair? He still kicking? But also, candidate Trump was just a candidate then. More events back then meant less planning, with worse personnel.
He’s not having that rapid stream of events to attend these days. They get more planning if there are fewer big public events, and it’s the Secret Service’s presidential agents protecting him now.
…what’s the end game anyways? Putting Peter Thiel’s avatar in charge?
It’s always a first time assassin, incompetent enough to think it’s possible vs a team of professionals trained in the prevention of such events, who are part of a long lived organisation focused on that task alone.
The secret service are dedicated en mass to stopping such events and have been successful the majority of times.
No the chance is not zero, but it’s near enough. You’re welcome to put that to the test. But you’d be better off doing a historical analysis of modern era coups.
Start with something like this video:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs&list=PLrttDbiWQ1XO1iHAszAsPobYSoR0uQg_1&index=1&pp=iAQB
P.S Oh right, it’s easier to fantasize about someone else doing an assassination for you. Putting JD Vance in charge. Nice clean and simple fantasy.
Nice fantasy. But that’s all it is. He’ll have bullet proof glass, weapons aren’t allowed at his rallies. You don’t think people tried this with Hitler, Stalin, and Putin? It’s said there were over 600 attempts on Castro’s life. He died of old age.
Hell, people tried it with Nixon, Regan, and Obama, people try these things all the time.
No they don’t. There’s already been multiple failed attempts on his life. People have tired your methods. He has helicopter to get away from the hoards.
Yeah, that was already ahown last time with the proudboys and all the groups in J6… And it’s why Musk was doing Nazi signalling.
Those groups and sub groups will eventually be his brown shirts or red guard.
No, and in fact the industry is going to see a reduction as people and companies are realising it’s not a silver bullet solution or even that great at what it does.
The next branch of LLM modeling (now AGI is failing), is likely towards specialisation. Specialised AI problem solving has far more potential than chasing an ill defined and half formed concept of “intelligence”.
No term can exist on its own like that. Everything is relative.
Even MORE reason not to upgrade!
I only know what I know from the Behind the Bastards episodes about him, and it’s kinda difficult to summarize:
It was Clarence Thomas himself, he worked with pro apartied South African Lobbyists during the Reagan era and with their lobby, The Lincoln Review:
As for Musk, let’s just say it was all of them.
So Jared Leto.