At a random time, when nothing is happening, hand him a “paid talent release form”.

If you look up “talent release form” it’s what allows a creator to use materials with another person. As it stands now, he asked you to participate but did not have you sign a release (with no fee), so you own partial rights to income from that video.

Say to him: “Since you are a pretty big creator I assume you’re familiar with releases. I grabbed a standard one to give you rights to my previously included videos, and here’s another for any future videos including me for a 50% share. I’ll sign them after you approve and sign unless you have a standard set you would like to use”

This makes it a business transaction, vs a “leave me alone”. He won’t want to figure out how to pay you, so he’ll probably stop.

When a deputy said he suspected the shooting may have caused the victim’s death, Adams “became visibly upset and began to cry,” the affidavit stated. The deputy also told him that “while he was shooting towards the ground in his backyard that there was nothing behind his property to stop any bullets from traveling beyond his property and hurting someone,” the affidavit stated.

The state failed. This man should have not been allowed to own a handgun without proper training. I’d bet in this moment he had no idea bullets would bounce up. Just sad that some basic laws would solve this.

As a former photographer back when digital was starting to become the default, I wish I had thought of this.

My mother recently got one of the arm glucose monitors. Is there a good FOSS guide anywhere for them? (Unfortunately she’s on iPhone).

Those aren’t build logs. Those are “I took an open source software package and put commercial hardware around it.”

Which is fine, since it’s MIT software (and why I push for GPL, personally). What’s not fine is a creator calling their commercial product “open” or “DIY” without a BOM or build log.

I would revise the post title regardless of what the author calls it, personally.

I posted this as a comment on the creator’s post. Will have to see if they respond.

I see “open” in the title, but no git or Bill of Materials (BOM) links. Is this actually open? Or based on other’s open efforts?

Wouldnt standard PPE ear protection render this useless?

Linux or Mac shop in the past 3 places.

Thanks! Perhaps Thunder (what I am using) does the same, but since this is an avif it’s not picked up in filters. I’ll start keeping a list of extensions as I see these, as “links vs images” seems to be happening more in posts. The information collection continues.

What client did you post this with? Trying to debug why it’s a link instead of the image.

And again their is an avenue that could be easily exploited.

And they lost all they’re credibility.

Ahh I stand corrected. Thanks!

Yea this is the thing that gets me. My understanding was he invented something to improve optics, and patented it. It wasn’t like he made some paint that nobody could use. Am I wrong?

Other way around, sir.