You say wsj is reputable, and then suggest filtering Murdoch. Murdoch bought wsj in 2007.

Isn’t the rule about hair not going past eyebrows or ear lobes? Every picture I’ve seen of this dude meets that requirement. I really don’t understand the reasoning behind the violation?

Reporting in from US. The only results supporting this article are from the article itself. Garbage outlet. You should really just delete this post. It’s literally the driving force behind what you are complaining about.

tbf, this is probably suburban / rural areas to move back into urban areas that are already having crises. Won’t fix any of the housing markets in high population centers.

Not paying as much as someone currently makes doesn’t necessarily mean they are underpaying. Could be a different industry, department, etc.

Okay but being better able to detect X doesn’t mean you are unable to detect Y well enough. I’d say the physical attributes of children and dark-skinned people would make it more difficult for people to see objects as well, under many conditions. But that doesn’t require a news article.

What are the good resources? Because I just searched “Canada wildfire info” and got the Canadian Wild land Fire Information System" seems like a good place to start? Stop using Facebook for this shit (or anything else)