There’s still loads of bullshit surrounding the name. Hope your personal filters are up to the task the next 4 years.

Capitalism doesn’t sell performance. It sell ‘potential’ and ‘perceived gains’.

I went back to my country’s sub and I swear to God some of the posts are ai generated questions designed to trigger a visceral response. That, or the community is now filled with socially inept people who simply don’t know what is appropriate in social conversation anymore.

Why does it look like she blew one at a time early on, but when the shot changes it looked like she blew them all at once?

They make him look good and normal.

Well. Not exactly.

Automation. Not ai. Ai in its current form is still crap.

So everybody looks like the picture on Epstein’s Wikipedia now? How dumb is this?

Figures. All the gps data in the world and the idiots on the road still can’t figure their exit, cut across 3 lanes to reach it, or realize they’ve passed it, slam it into reverse and move against incoming traffic to get back to it. Seriously. The most connected generation in human history can’t think themselves out of a goddamn box. Rant over, now get off my effing lawn!

So I guess America’s justice system protects the powerful and only prosecutes the weak, dishevelled and minorities. This is bullshit, and Americans should be disappointed and embarrassed.

Lol. You’re highlighting ops problem exactly. Oversimplification of the issue and delegation of the documentation problem to the engineering department is the exact reason people there feel resentment. It’s simply not their job. As the other commenter posted - the system spans multiple disciplines and workflows, yet it seems only the engineer is tasked with understanding it all, in order to build the system. Consultants register this as a risk, and management assigns this to engineering because ‘only they understand the code’ - is exactly the problem op is facing.

The system is the property of the company. The company’s language should be used to capture it’s design, function and intent (what it does) versus how it is done (it’s expression in code). There’s a reason they call it ‘living documentation’ - it,.and the company’s understanding, should evolve along with the code.

Edit: are you seriously letting ‘random’ segments into your code? I think I found your problem…

Frankly, it’s tiresome trying to describe technical details with business analysts who glaze over something you’re passionate about, treating it like nerdsprak. If the engineer has spent any amount of time producing a solution, you can bet he’s passionate and invested. Give credit where credit is due and don’t sound like an obnoxious condescending douchbag when doing so. People can tell when a disinterested person is giving fake praise. It’s quite different when a crowd of peers is giving recognition of a job well done. And no, you’re probably not as smart as they are in their field of expertise.

Also, listen to their input. They don’t want a product with their name going live with a feature the bean counters want, but the engineers know make the product worse. It’s like a mom watching your daughter to go to prom with a cheap haircut because dad as too cheap to fork out for a perm. You know what I mean.

This is why documentation of business process and methods is so important. A lot of time, the engineer solves seemingly small problems without oversight, so imagine a decades old collection of many innocuous solutions leading to the whole ‘dunno what this does’. If it’s important enough to commit to a mission critical system, it’s important enough to document.

Also, it’s incredibly frustrating for an engineer to be given a one line brief, work his ass off producing the solution, then have the business analyst take credit for the work, and not bother to even learn how the system works, even at a high level. It sows distrust and disdain.

Oh there’ll be gain. But not for the user.

You misspelled felon.

Funny how contempt is so poorly defined in law.

Daddy Putin proud!

Where Canada dumps and mexico throws up.

North mexico.

Maybe his dumb tariffs will encourage more local industry and less reliance on the economic behemoths like us china etc.

Lol still applying decorum to the baby in chief, I see. Why not just tell him to fuck off?

Battlestar Galactica.

…no wait!