• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 31st, 2025

help-circle
  • keep debtors and investors from ripping apart a company and then transferring the debt to the ones running it

    So instead we get “vulture capitalism” as an entire ecosystem of companies, doing this but with more diffuse consequences, by spreading out the bag holders far and wide (but always among the powerless). Fits like a glove with the general “privatize profits, socialize losses” strategy of wealth extraction we like so much.

    Corporate person-hood is a stain on humanity and the world. We should never have shifted culpability and direct experience of negative consequences away from human beings, ever.



  • The very hardest part of designing software, and especially designing abstractions that aim to streamline use of other tools, is deciding exactly where you draw the line(s) between intended flexibility (user should be able and find it easy to do what they want), and opinionated “do it my way here, and I’ll constrain options for doing otherwise”.

    You have very clear and thoughtful lines drawn here, about where the flexibility starts and ends, and where the opinionated “this is the point of the package/approach, so do it this way” parts are, too.

    Sincerely that’s a big compliment and something I see as a strong signal about your software design instincts. Well done! (I haven’t played with it yet, to be clear, lol)


  • This sounds really interesting, I’m looking forward to reading the comments here in detail and looking at the project, might even end up incorporating it into my own!

    I’m working on something that addresses the same problem in a different way, the problem of constraining or delineating the specifically non-deterministic behavior one wants to involve in a complex workflow. Your approach is interesting and has a lot of conceptual overlap with mine, regarding things like strictly defining compliance criteria and rejecting noncompliant outputs, and chaining discrete steps into a packaged kind of “super step” that integrates non-deterministic substeps into a somewhat more deterministic output, etc.

    How involved was it to build it to comply with the OpenAI API format? I haven’t looked into that myself but may.




  • Exactly right.

    As such, any bleating about markets being driven by “consumer choice” is either hopelessly out of date / embarrassingly naive - or malicious.

    Just as consumer sales are a rounding error, so is consumer choice - it’s a direct relationship.

    This extends a lot farther than the AI bubble, we have allowed corporations to merge and monopolize, and “investors” to gamble on it all, to where they completely invert the relationship.

    They shape our experience by constraining choice, dictating only options with profit margins and heinous licensing terms that work exclusively and overwhelmingly in their favor.








  • .world is known for censoring topics precisely like you’re complaining about, as well as having a reputation for some of the most toxic mod behavior across the Lemmy instances*.

    Specific mods, plural, on .world are known to encounter comments they disagree with, and go back through user histories looking for unrelated, thin excuses for bans.

    I don’t care quite enough to go find sources, these are my accumulated observations. But they are fairly well known and uncontroversial, among those who watch such things, I believe.

    [*originally said Fediverse in place of Lemmy, bigger claim I realized I wasn’t meaning to make at all]