It’s a shit argument. A photo, digital or otherwise is CREATING the location. It’s a copy of a thing that already exists.
AI can create entire songs complete with vocals that can fool engineered with have been in the business for their entire life. This is not remotely close to the same thing and you know it.
Any HUMAN being using learned skill to capture a photo is art. Because art is something produced by a mind that strives to create it.
AI is not art because AI can’t comprehend art.
Go ahead and tell the AI to scout out the location, then travel to the location to shoot, wait for the optimal lighting conditions and then find the best angle and camera settings to capture that one in a million photo that your years of experience working with film and photography tools taught you.
If you can tell me honestly that an AI would do the same job, then I’m going to say you should find a new hobby.
I have heard this bogus “but what about a camera?” argument more times than I can count. And it’s always a poor argument in defense of AI.
Anyone that uses AI to compose music or make art is neither a musician, nor an artist- any more than I am a mathematician because I use a calculator.
It’s trash.
Dumb phones are about to get crazy popular. I miss my Pebbl.
Strongly disagree No one of sound mind is going to be coerced by Ai to do jack shit.
I remember that. Man…. That makes me hate things.
While I despise everything AI, you cannot sue because your kid is stupid.
LOL…. We’re so fucked.
Let’s see:
Hitlers killed:
Hitler - 1
Everyone else - 0
Yep. This is true.
Someone had to do it.
There are phone calls and texting. There is zero excuse to remain in support of platforms that do this.
And if your friends remain on Facebook, they’re part of the problem too because apparently, any victims of the actions made by Zuckerberg can suck it so long as they can share and look at super cool memes.
If you still have e a Facebook account, you fully support this.
Are you trying to say the front fell off?
AI will never make anything better in the realm of entertainment/journalism, and anyone who uses it for this purpose is a talentless hack that lacks the creativity to stand on their own merit.
Yep. I’ve always called them the Fox News of the left.
Couldn’t agree more if I tried.
Seriously what is up with these articles? No one has turned on shit. MAGA is a bought-and-paid-for sunken cost for these people. They’re all-in. They aren’t turning on anyone!
Go ahead and check Raw Story’s “journalistic” history. It’s mostly just hopium/copium slop.
“MAGA melts down after…”
“Trump furious because…”
“Judge SLAMS MAGA over….”
Meanwhile, not a fucking thing is changing, progressing, being fixed, undone, or halted in any meaningful way.
We’re being sold on action that isn’t happening. It’s an insulting pacifier that ok many people have no problem sucking on every single fucking day- several times a day.
Okay. I’m convinced you’re one of these “artists” I referred to. No one defends trash that hasn’t found a way to get something from it.
Stop with the camera thing. It’s a bad argument. It’s not remotely the same thing. And every time I hear it- which is a lot because it’s The only thing the “artists” and “musicians” use to defend their trash- it makes me cringe.