Oh no! Anyways

He is correct, the controversy is that Andy praised one allegedly good decision out of many many bad ones. I.e. this might be one half step forward, but many steps backwards overall

Not with this attitude

Hopefully their insurers won’t go bankrupt

Seems related to https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/27573120

Are there no moderators in these groups? I thought Matrix had a structure similar to Discord

Lol I tried looking for info online when it was right there ib the article 🤦‍♂️

Wrt win PCs %, how does that compare to the win 7 to win 10 transition?

Thanks! I’ll sign up for that instead

Alright, time to unsubscribe then. Thanks!

Suggest a law to help make it harder to reveal unintended consequences, but revise if unintended consequences happen. Got it

Or some of his supporters are impressionable

CDC calls for a little less, 75m of intensive exercise a week and two full body workouts a week (At a minimum)

That may make it more secure than other clients, but the surface is still larger. Any time you add an executable

In the cons there’s also an increase of the attack surface since you’ll be using a program to run the VPN

On the pros, some offer DNS blocking

There’s a lot more issues that are inherent to this that I’m against making this mainstream. E.g. if these cars get special road status, will it be maintenance and changes (humans can read signs)? If there will be competition, will the cars then drive empty near places to shorten waiting times? Will it drive these companies to push propaganda to build cities for cars again (i.e. inventing “Jaywalking”, round 2)?

Won’t be able to put it in the dishwasher then most likely

Google would

I was under the impression Apple already allows RCS, and that RCS is E2EE, I was wrong.

There was a surge of signups when WhatsApp changed its ToS to allow businesses to record/save conversations. Signal had issues with signing up. At that time it also didn’t support LG G4 phones anymore.