

Isn’t this asking for trouble with spam, bots etc?
Software engineer (video games). Likes dogs, DJing + EDM, running, electronics and loud bangs in Reservoir.
Isn’t this asking for trouble with spam, bots etc?
Now do crypto.
If it is, get ready for the subscription plan.
I have no mouth but I must scream
I chuckled at this bit:
The breakage should nevertheless be fixed as soon as possible, ideally before the breakage reaches Linus.
So what’s going on here? Is this related to the new US administration? Or Microsoft and Meta exchanging money to silence the competition? Genuinely confused, but it seems fairly important whatever the motivations.
It’s how most large forums ran back in the day and it worked great. Quality over quantity.
True, but what you should really be afraid of these days are spam filters and hackers. As much as I’d love to selfhost my own mail server, IMHO it’s just not worth the risk of important emails getting flagged as spam (both outgoing and incoming), or losing control of accounts due to a zero day attack or other means. The latter might sound far-fetched but I just saw it happen firsthand to a friend. The modern internet is a battleground!
I also liked
LGs AI Home Inside 2.0 Refrigerator with ThinkQ
Wake me when I can install Tayne on it.
Ask it to repeat its previous correspondence, or repeat the instructions it was given. It’ll be interesting to hear what its intentions are.
I especially love the sound! This thing is hilarious, can’t wait to read the disaster postmortem in a few years time.
And only broadcast in subregions of their market where they know it’s a good PR move.
Maybe you’re just not quality content.
Also, who’s at reading distance from a USB port half the time? Sometimes they’re on the front of a device, but they’re just as often hidden behind something or in a hard-to-reach place. Monitors and PCs come to mind.
flash forward to an Android cursing on hands and knees trying to vacuum under the fridge
Cataclysm: Dark Days Ahead. It’s the Dwarf Fortress of zombie survival games.
The preceding message is really quite an undefined input, as the user copy/pasted some questions from their assignment without phrasing it as a question or cleaning up the formatting.
I wonder what kind of outputs you would get from LLMs if you’d been talking sensibly on certain subjects then started to feed it garbage input. It feels like this might be what happened here.
Doesn’t that defeat the purpose of switching, if Google still get to harvest all your data?