Following the latest batch of court documents, these names have been added:

• Richard Branson
• Sergey Brin

click on the link in the post

One allegation already made public concerns David Copperfield, an associate of both Casablancas and Trump, who judged Look of the Year in 1988 and 1991, and once dated another Elite supermodel, Claudia Schiffer. Two years ago, as the #MeToo movement reverberated through the entertainment industry, he was the subject of allegations by Brittney Lewis, a 17-year-old contestant in the 1988 Look of the Year, held in Japan. According to her account, published on the entertainment news website The Wrap, Copperfield invited her to a show in California after she had returned home to Utah. Lewis alleged that she saw Copperfield pour something into her glass and then blanked out, but says she retained hazy recollections of him sexually assaulting her in his hotel room.

In reference to the court documents, John Casablancas was mentioned only in questioning without any direct allegations, however, I believe he came up in questioning because of his relationship with David Cooperfield, the magician, and pedophile it seems.

Rich people can afford to pay lawyers and evade courts; now the rich and powerful have the support from the captured system… which is why Epstein was tipped off to his search warrant.

Some of the names are mentioned only in questioning, others are directly implicated as abusers. The relevant details are in the forum post.

They really do think that they’re a superior race of humans with full dominion over the lower species.

when I was looking some of these people up, I was surprised how many billionaires came up…

In the 37th annual Forbes list of the world’s billionaires, the list included 2,640 billionaires with a total net wealth of $12.2 trillion, down 28 members and $500 billion from 2022.

however, when considering that there are only ~2,600 billionaires in the world, I could see how these ultra rich only associate with each other.

hi wravoc, good to see you again and i must say your git page is looking sweeet

Wow this comment section looks like a Raytheon board meeting.

Depending on your vehicle… It’s possible to remove all the Nanny tracking via some DIY hacks or even a call to “opt out”

If you think Fdroid security is on par with Google security… then I got a bridge to sell you

An upstream compromise that affects downstream hosts. A good example is the NPM supply chain attack -> https://hackaday.com/2021/10/22/supply-chain-attack-npm-library-used-by-facebook-and-others-was-compromised/

The diminished security resulting from the increased likelihood of a (single point of failure) supply chain attack.

Yes its possible for malicious devs to trojan apps, but due to apk signing it is much more difficult for a third party entity to induce a supply chain attack, which is my real concern when it comes to phone security.

If you have a lower threat model, this post isn’t for you…

Sure, atleast you admit there’s a trade off (security) for (FOSS) and maybe some additional privacy.

People should be made aware of the risks and choose according to their threat models, which is why I’ve highlighted some of these issues to begin with.

What’s gonna happen when hackers take over skynet?

Doesn’t affect the end user… beyond diminished security. Are you implying I should trust Fdroid devs as much as I would trust Google devs?

Sure, I’ll spell it out for you since apparently the point went right over your head. Fdroid devs are a single point of failure by signing every application themselves. This introduces a potential for supply chain attack, not to mention Fdroid running on EOL servers.

When you use an individual dev repo, you can avoid any trojanized apps from Fdroid because the developers maintain their own infrastructure and sign their own apks.

That’s called… D I S T R I B U T E D T R U S T

Did you even read the article? F-Droid signs all the apps in the main repo…

Love F-Droid but be aware of the risks and always try to use a developer repo when possible…

https://privsec.dev/posts/android/f-droid-security-issues/