No, that was certifying the election (where Congress counts the electoral votes). Inauguration is the 20th.
No, that was certifying the election (where Congress counts the electoral votes). Inauguration is the 20th.
6 days until that happens.
Unless you really are drinking that much water. If you’re drinking a few gallons a day, expect to be peeing constantly. Your body isn’t going to water to retain all of that and it has to go somewhere. Most bladders can only hold like 2 cups.
Ah yeah, I was misunderstanding.
I think I might be misunderstanding. If he felt he wasn’t smart enough to get anything out of college, isn’t it better that he not go? Like it seems more spoiled to go to college without the expectation you’d get the degree. You’re taking a spot from someone who thinks they’ll graduate, wasting your parents’ money, and delaying becoming a self sufficient adult for no pay off.
Yeah, I think the premise is actually “What did people say 20 years ago that they don’t now.”
I think your ratios are backwards? ((1*75%)+(2*0%))/3= 25% but ((2*75%)+(1*0%))/3=50%
Edit: unless it’s anything 20% to 50% that works.
I think it might struggle when comments get deleted. And this comment chain is a bit of a mess start to finish haha
The article didn’t specifically show other age groups but it did give the overall number which shows more disapproval, implying that older age groups found it less acceptable. It also links to the survey that shows the different ages’ break down:
The survey from Emerson College Polling found 68 percent of all respondents found the actions of the person who shot and killed Thompson unacceptable.
The comment was in reference to their misunderstanding rather than any doubt about what landlords are doing.
I think you misunderstood the issue. House/apartment rental companies use software to price fix with each other.
Depends on where he lives and what he wants to do. He’s still a felon and in some states it affects your right to vote, right to own a gun, receive government assistance, etc.
“Approve my claim or i’ll kill you” is not a warning. it’s a threat.
Yep that would be a threat. That’s not what she said though. She never said she’d do anything. She was just pointing out that someone was recently killed for the behavior they’re exhibiting, so if they’re going to keep doing that behavior, it stands to reason the same thing will happen to them.
You don’t want drug addicts being solely responsible for a newborn baby do you? The only way to be sure that doesn’t happen is to test people.
I don’t know if the original intention was just that naïve or if it was always sinister, but it’s definitely used in discriminatory ways and does more harm than good.
Sometimes the powers that be need the proper motivation needed to get rid of the orphan crushing machine.
We have tons of video evidence of cops planting evidence for smaller things than this.
It’s a McDonald’s. Do people even look up the reviews for a McDonald’s before going?
You got to read more of the sentence:
The killing has sparked public outrage and dark humor on social media, reflecting widespread frustration with health insurers
The outrage isn’t about the killing. The outrage is about the health insurers. The killing is just the spark that got us all to talk about it.
Clinton pardoned his brother for selling cocaine. It’s not like this is the first time a Democrat has done this.
Social studies was history? And civics and economics and religion/philosophy and geography. It’s just the overarching name for the study of human society.