Well let’s see… Here’s a few from this thread:

• Being really into something and struggling to not correct people when they say something wrong about that thing. And when you do correct them, they think you’re being egotistical.
• Being selectively mute
• Having autistic friends
• Having non-typical views about gender and/or sexuality
• Being diagnosed with BPD, bipolar, anxiety, depression, and several other mental health disorders. Especially true for women. This is because doctors tend to suck at identifying autistic people and instead think these other things are what they’re seeing.

There are many other signs also, but this is just some that may be helpful. Bear in mind that someone can have any of those things and not be autistic, but when they have a bunch of them together, they’re probably autistic.

What it means to be autistic. What makes this more fun is how much learning about autism has essentially become a special interest of mine. The amount of responses in this thread that scream unrealized autistic is very high. :D

My pro has 2 ports.

Well then, at least give me 2 more USB C on the other side.

My point is that she can be @taylorswift.com not @[email protected]. Also, exaggerating the number of illiterate people in the USA doesn’t help your argument. You can already be @FaylorSwift on twitter so I’m still not seeing how this is any more secure than using her actual domain that her fans may be familiar with.

Eh, anyone with their own domain can use it even without hosting anything. It just takes a DNS record. So Taylor Swift can have @taylorswift.com or w/e her official website is and that’s pretty much the exact same situation as claiming domain ownership. Someone else could likely register taylorswift.boats but I think most people would realize something is off there.

For me, there is far more content available if I want to doom scroll, especially about a particular topic.

Look, I recognize that it’s possible for LLMs to produce code that is literally someone else’s copyrighted code. However, the way I use copilot is almost exclusively to autocomplete my thoughts. Like, I write enough code until it guesses what I was about to write next. If that happens to be open source code that someone else has written, then it is complete coincidence that I thought of writing that code. Not all thoughts are original.

Further, whether I should be at fault for LLM vendors who may be breaking copyright law, is like trying to make a case for me being at fault for murder because I drive a car when car manufacturers lobby to the effect that people die more.

Ahh right, so when I use copilot to autocomplete the creation of more tests in exactly the same style of the tests I manually created with my own conscious thought, you’re saying that it’s really just copying what someone else wrote? If you really believe that, then you clearly don’t understand how LLMs work.

That might be the goal but it is a long way away. The current models have no chance of replacing a skilled engineer. We will need completely new types of models to start getting close to that.

That’s not how that works. If there isn’t a binary (because there isn’t just 2 options) then this would be a non-binary system and so everyone would be non-binary.

Was looking for this comment. Thank you.

Not sure why Pepperidge Farm struck you as the healthy brand. Only real way to know is to check the nutrition label and ingredients yourself.

While it is certainly not the only reason, government intervention via zoning laws is definitely a factor in the house crisis. If mixed use zoning was more universally a thing, then that would be the government not intervening in the housing market.

None is specifically called out as being an option.

Make sure the toilet is too tall for most people too.

Just look at your watch and give them the exact time until midnight. Problem solved and more menacing.