Mathematically? Well, I’ll try: AI can create art that will replace human art so quickly, thanks to the quality data collected and the huge influx of money. Not exactly convincing, patterns also play an important role: for example, most people draw this way, or most shadows in 2D are depicted this way, and over time, based on patterns and carefully selected data, the AI would learn to create content in the same way as humans, only without fatigue mode, which means that the quality will not drop even if the AI stops learning as if time had stopped. This is a simple explanation that I can give because I don’t want to waste time looking for and checking articles that support my opinion.

We live in a funny world.

I agree with you, Lemmy is disappointing, but I try not to lose hope in people.

That said, given the new chip developments, especially the quantum chip breakthrough in the future, after the AI bubble, there’s a risk that AI will be able to create content like this, pretending to be human so well that you’ll start trusting it.

I have sources, but I won’t show them, as I’ve noticed that people on Lemmy are very negative and unlikely to understand anything even if they see it with their own eyes, they probably think that after the AI bubble, the AI will stop developing.

This feels more like an opinion than a question.

You’re right here, but in fact, if you noticed, it’s a mixture of question and opinion.

Maybe for series you start it off with an editable master post that you link to and edit every time?

Yeah.

Ao3 (Archive of Our Own) exists for people who want to read stories. People come to Lemmy (and sites like it) to interact.

Well, the concept of communicating here is a little strange… But this place is still better than the discord that is watching you.

I think he should have advised people to read Machiavelli’s The Prince.

I think these people will survive. Vaccines may be with a surprise.

And all these memory are spent on the generation of pornographic content in the highest quality.

My friend gives 80-95 percent because of the price of housing, as well as the fact that his wife and kids constantly wants to live well, well, that is, food of high quality, and so on.

Unfortunately, because of his kindness, he often suffers because of this.

It seems to me that it is better to use instead of an expression - in the era of artificial intelligence - in the era of the threat from artificial intelligence, and to add: from those who promote it at any cost for profit.

Oh, it seems that in the future books will become popular.

My English teacher at high school apparently married an ex-student about 1 year after he finished school. Nothing underhanded, they just met up again and struck it up. She was built nicely, like Sofia Vergara.

The story that I gave as an example, since I suddenly remembered it today, is quite similar, but that’s only in that story, the guy was damn assertive.

Unexpected.

AI are very good at pretending to be people, so I think this method will stop working over time.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator