https://lemmy.world/comment/14512485
I wouldn’t say they’re moderate.
https://lemmy.world/comment/14512485
I wouldn’t say they’re moderate.
That’s a very accurate assessment. Even on hexbear there’s contentious debate regarding China and Soviet Russia.
Holy shit the sea of strawmen in this thread is insane.
If someone claims something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they’re lying.
I am requesting that link in lieu of an image macro
Yeah, shorthand for this is Tankie
Yes. However we can agree that all colonialism and imperialism is bad regardless of political structure in power.
I really hope this is the way forward.
I agree, that’s why it’s in quotes. In reality they’re being put in camps on the border and hidden away from the media.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_internment_camps
Pinyin link below
http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2019-03/18/c_1124247196.htm
The companies deploying the algorithms aren’t taking any of what you said into consideration though. They only want to feed you what has the most interaction as that can garner the most money from ad revenue.
That doesn’t make them propaganda. Tibet exists, I’ve been there. I have friends living there. The CIA paid for places to put listening equipment along China’s border. They did it in Cuba too. Is Castro propaganda?
You also deny that the Uyghurs are being disappeared and “reeducated”. The Uyghurs are being treated just like the First Nations people in America were. Their land and customs stand in the way of Chinese “progress”
Are you paid by China? Or are you just a useful idiot?
https://lemmy.world/modlog/873048?page=1&modId=107790
Whoah. You’re ruining /c/latestagecapitalism…why aren’t you letting other leftists in the space?
The AP is not propaganda. I can’t find anything you’ve alleged about vaccines. Also you became extremely defensive once I posted anything someone could site or someone else could reference. You’re also defending narcos and US corporations by proxy by just saying votes were bought in the last election. There’s no proof of that anywhere.
I think you’re derailing threads. You seem to have a history of spreading misinformation and also strangely purging your comment history. Which are both techniques of misinformation merchants.
I’m not trying to compete with you. Why are you so defensive?
Thank you for responding. I gave a couple links that you could give context to so other people can get a better understanding of your point. I lived in Ciudad before all the anglos and “digital nomads” started all the gentrification there.
US corporations and the War on Drugs have fucked over Mexico in such a way I don’t think will ever get fixed in my lifetime.
I’m confused about this comment. I think what would help me get a handle on your viewpoint is if you could give me your opinion on Vicente Fox. Also what you think the impact a border wall would have on mixed communities like Brownsville and Matamoros.
Suggested reading for others if they’re interested.
https://www.academia.edu/124548850/The_War_on_Drugs_in_Mexico_Narco_Culture_and_Conflict
System working as intended. It’s not intentionally being done to destabilize Mexico so that the US can have cheap labor and a depressed secondary market. But for some reason we’re not in the business of “nation building” in Mexico, like we were in say Iraq or Afghanistan. Even though the way narco cultura operate is very similar to ISIL/ISIS/ISI.
I dunno something to do with the petro dollar and needing a secondary manufacturing market where corporations can buy Chinese parts and assemble them to bypass tariffs and trade agreements.
Not to say that any nation building efforts would help the Mexican people, just that it’s convenient to have a cheap source of labor on our southern border. Especially one where through NAFTA corporations aren’t beholden to US Law.
See CocaCola for a prime example.
I literally just got bigger drives for my array last week. So happy I put it off.
The WHO has it’s problems. None of these are solved by such an immediate reduction in funding. What a shitgibbon.