• 10 Posts
  • 2.11K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle








  • jet@hackertalks.comtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldAllergen blood test?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Which elimination diets have you used? They didn’t work?

    The carnivore diet is often used in a elimination protocol because it’s very well tolerated by people. Red meat, water, and salt. 90 days - if that doesn’t resolve your issue then it may not be a food based issue.

    Judy Cho has a book detailing the protcol and rationale - Carnivore Cure: The Ultimate Elimination Diet

    In addition to eliminating all the organic toxins in foods which you might be intolerant of https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/natural-toxins-in-food , it also removes industrial pesticides from your diet, which you might also be reacting too.




  • Cholesterol is a broad term and doesn’t address the specifics necessary to addr iness overall average health for an individual.

    I agree completely, people should not be trying to treat a cholesterol number. They should be optimizing their metabolic health. Cholesterol should be an indicator that further follow-up is required, either arterial imaging, or diet and lifestyle interventions

    Then there is the whole “sugar” issue. There are dozens of sugars and we only associate the term with fructose or sucrose. We can technically name all sorts of things as sugars, but if it doesn’t include sucrose and fructose explicitly, then it “isn’t” sugar on the label.

    Happily, all of those sugars do get included in the carbohydrate label on packaging. I would say dietary carbohydrates are the biggest culprit in cardiovascular disease, and that’s what people should focus on instead of cholesterol.


  • https://www.dietdoctor.com/low-carb/saturated-fat#evidence-to-date

    Not all experts agree.

    • A 2009 meta-analysis of 28 cohort studies and 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concluded “The available evidence from cohort and randomised controlled trials is unsatisfactory and unreliable to make judgment about and substantiate the effects of dietary fat on risk of CHD.”
    • A 2010 meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies found no association between saturated fat intake on CHD outcomes.
    • A 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials found that the evidence does not clearly support dietary guidelines that limit intake of saturated fats and replace them with polyunsaturated fats.
    • A 2015 meta-analysis of 17 observational studies found that saturated fats had no association with heart disease, all-cause mortality, or any other disease.
    • A 2017 meta-analysis of 7 cohort studies found no significant association between saturated fat intake and CHD death.

    Plus more at the above well cited reference


  • Extremely well written! Thank you for putting that together

    Eating lots of meat isn’t a problem for cholesterol

    There is a group of people, the LMHR (lean mass hyper responders) who do have highly elevated cholesterol on very keto/carnivore diets.

    The outstanding question is if cholesterol is actually harmful in of itself - the data I’ve seen indicates that it isn’t harmful.






  • donate.wikimedia.org as an example, requires a email address, and their policy is

    We do not sell or trade your information to anyone. By donating, you agree to share your personal information with the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization that hosts Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, and its service providers pursuant to our donor policy. Wikimedia Foundation and its service providers are located in the United States and in other countries whose privacy laws may not be equivalent to your own. For more information please read our donor policy.

    they keep all of the personal info, so yes, it very much starts a relationship with them.

    In order to donate with traditional systems, you have to dox yourself