I get that it’s less secure, but using verified flatpaks beats homebrew by a large margin.
Programmer by day, burnt out by night.
I get that it’s less secure, but using verified flatpaks beats homebrew by a large margin.
Shame they didn’t mention that homebrew is a security nightmare and will happily download maliciously modified code
That’s so true, I was missing this part! With homebrew you’re at the mercy of whoever put the package out there, much like with installers (and nix to be fair)
Edit: omg then the author claims flatpak is better for security?!? It has the same nightmare security issues.
LMAO no‽ Flatpaks can be verified, and you can choose not to install unverified flatpaks (which you should!) They are also containerised pretty well by default, in case they’re malicious!
I’m just happy my boi nix got a shoutout.
I love having a packages file and a lock file, both user-specific rather than system-wide, offering reproducibility, stability and a good, central place where I can see what I did to debug.
Nobody said anything about the init system, though.
If anything, I think it’s people used to Windows or macOS that don’t want anything to change that tend to hate Linux systems; it’s not exactly Windows/macOS (and doesn’t run exactly the MS Office and Adobe suits) so they hate it.
[ The person editing this and has done plenty of research from multiple trustworthy sources. ]
That reads sus. Like “Trust me bro” in nicer words.
That’s a very roundabout way to say that he doesn’t enjoy consequences.
It also seems like English changing the letter J from a /j/ sound to a /dzj/ sound didn’t help, going by how “Iacobus” became Jacob somewhere down that line.
jimjam5 wouldn’t mind the name Saint Jim?
I feel you’re biased 😋
It’s wild that the name Diego becomes James in English!
I would’ve thought of Daniel or something but no, JAMES
To add to @[email protected]
The uutils are MIT licensed, simply put it means “do whatever you want with it, as long as you credit us”.
The coreutils are GPL, simply put “do whatever you want with it but only in other GPL works, also credit us”.
The coreutils make sure forks will also be open source.
While the uutils aren’t closed source, they do allow you to make closed source forks.
The uutils’ license is too permissive.
Likely not anytime soon as they tend to hold off latest features and prefer older (but maintained) LTS versions of just about everything. Also especially not if it turns out to be a bad idea; they explicitly build Mint without Snaps since their inclusion in the Ubuntu base.
Mainly memory safety; split
(which is also used for other programs like sort
) had a memory heap overflow issue last year to name one.
The GNU Coreutils are well tested and very well written, the entire suite of programs has a CVE only once every few years from what I can see, but they do exist and most of those would be solved with a memory and type safe language.
That said, Rust also handles parallelism and concurrency much better than C ever could, though most of these programs don’t really benefit from that or not much since they already handled this quite well, especially for C programs.
uutils/Linux?
What is this table from? Is it from some website?
Sure, ok, that’s still my daily driver, it’s incredibly stable (and no, it’s not fucking outdated), but other than that it doesn’t help so much against accidentally borking your system.
So in this context, I’m recommending @[email protected] NixOS.
May I introduce you to my lord and saviour NixOS?
And not somehow break it more from there? Impressive!
I’ve found it needed a lot of extra steps, plus fidgeting with the OSTree defeats some of the safety/stability of it all.
Bazzite, at least, recommends against using OSTree blindly as that’s meant for sysconfig and recommends using Homebrew instead, as this lives in your user space and touches very little; but even installing libqalculate
gives memory issues. Most things I attempted to install did, actually.
The Ruby interpreter installed just fine, and was the only CLI program that installed just fine IIRC.
Now, I feel like it’s less of a hassle to Just Use Mint®, especially since I’ve got it installed anyway.
True, but saying Brew is unsafe but Flatpak isn’t, isn’t too odd, either.