Should have phrased it differently: Banning a post on a specific linux distribution is not a “ban on discussing linux” in general.

google used to work so well in the past when they still had these features

The linked article has a screenshot with a link to a post about openKylin getting removed. OP title is “Facebook ban on discussing Linux?” including the question mark. I don’t think it is accurate. At the same time I’m not defending Facebook in any way.

Discussing a specific linux distribution is not “discussing linux”.

Linking to a post on another website about a linux distribution isn’t either.

You are not alone.

Just pull the tape?

PR does not help long term if you don’t deliver.

No one mention any far right talking points

What makes those safer to use than the phone itself? Is it because they are considered part of the car so you are “allowed” to use them?

Ok did any twitter user believe they owned their account?

alternatively hold power and one of the volume buttons for a few seconds

agree, but for some reason many people don’t seem to think that way

Mastodon or Lemmy, because you would have to choose an instance and a client. Threads, because why would you?

can you tell

no because the angle is weird

How do you know how far you got? Do you remember the last number the next day?

This could be a nice little computer if it had good linux support

wtf is a hacked document?

Maybe limiting internet usage is enough, spending extra time on a linux pc with no internet might just be an opportunity to learn something.

not only OP, look at how many replies this has

both 16 and 16 pro have 128 GB base storage