it did happen. it could have happened to somebody better.
it did happen. it could have happened to somebody better.
they didn’t catch him because of bad opsec, unless you consider Tor to be bad opsec. they caught him with a parallel reconstruction after the NSA illegally spied on him.
change my mind
it was to kill competition who were threatening to kill him. id say if the law won’t protect you, you are free to protect yourself
disroot
autistici
i read it as a woman’s voice. what does that say about me?
09f911029d74e35bd84156e5635688c0
I think lol
nope. last “e” is a “c”. real close tho
disroot
depending on your politics, autistici
little brother
oooh. now do economics!!
have a nice day
that’s not what your source says.
I thought you were done
think of all the people who Kamala would have imprisoned, deported, or shipped the bombs to kill. go do something to save them.
the full definition requires an act. you cherry picked one ambiguously worded section.
there are still things you can do to save the people endangered by both your vote and the people who voted for the other candidate
In United States law, depraved-heart murder, also known as depraved-indifference murder, is a type of murder where an individual acts with a “depraved indifference” to human life and where such acts result in a death, despite that individual not explicitly intending to kill. In a depraved-heart murder, defendants commit an act even though they know their act runs an unusually high risk of causing death or serious bodily harm to a person. If the risk of death or bodily harm is great enough, ignoring it demonstrates a “depraved indifference” to human life and the resulting death is considered to have been committed with malice aforethought.
why wouldn’t you show the whole paragraph?
hey! I stole this first!!