In a semi truck?

In what way? If it’s the bumpers and the crumple zone, then that’s a feature. Do you have a picture about what you are talking about? I’m curious.

Twitter and Reddit went so much to shit and lowered the bar so much that Meta actually became almost not bad in my eyes, almost.

Eh. Using public well used spaces as your own personal living space is selfish and disrespectful of everyone else.

Hopefully you support a ban on private vehicles then? Special big trucks and SUVs.

Homelessness in no way has gone away, and in fact grew 7%, to 8,300 in January, according to the same federal count.

Then YOUR gymnastics are at the Russian elite spy level in a Bond movie.

According to the post description, he was punished AFTER he ticketed the higher ranking cop’s friend. Where did you pick up the being punished before part?

Seeing that they oppose school lunches, gun control and free healthcare, not your children’s lives either.

She

Please don’t do this. This will spawn feds continuously forever.

We already have an implementation. You me and OP are all on Lemmy. So can you answer these in the context of Lemmy again?

Most cops are unstable. That profession usually attracts a certain kind of person with unresolved mental issues.

At least in the US and in South Asia.

Haha nice try. If everyone starts liking it then it won’t be niche anymore. So I won’t share it! /s

Fedora KDE. Rock solid stable and my daily driver.

So is Netanyahu. That’s why ICC issued arrest warrants for both. Because both are terrorists.

There won’t be a conflict of interest because everyone is paying. So it’s not in the best interest of the other member countries if a corrupt country is getting a favourable report. Because their member fees are being wasted. So there’s checks and balances inherently built into the system.

So in a hypothetical similar scenario this report requested by LMG is funded by GN, Hardware Unboxed, The Verge and all the other YouTubers including the LMG. So there’s incentive to find faults in LMG within the group funding the report.

Nobody wants to watch a video to participate in a text-based debate

Why not? What’s wrong with using the most presentable, easy to digest content? If I needed to present a graph to support my claim would you rather have me describe that information in text rather than link to a picture or a video that shows that graph?

Also, there’s no need to watch the videos in length either to get what I’m presenting either. They describe and support proof to my 2 claims,

1. Investigator should be independent
2. There should be no conflict of interest in where money is coming from to pay the investigator

I presented 3 videos in a few comments but didn’t want to spam it to every reply. But here they are for your convenience.

1. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qwbq9OsHvp4
2. https://youtu.be/CTxt96DwaFk?si=0KHoVdFElOoH0-Za
3. https://youtu.be/C_0XEIFGK5o?si=Yc_hONVBDGcEV_t6

If you were thinking that we were having a debate, why don’t you stick to debate rules and present a rebuttal to my claims?

Yeah, nor does the country crowd source the money for the investigation,

But they do. IMF pools its money from its member countries, hence crowd sourcing. The country being investigated doesn’t pay them.

so I’m starting to see a pattern in your answers.

What pattern is that?

A good weekend for you too.

I’d like to receive criticism to what I presented instead of you resorting to ad-hominem, please.

inviting a third party to do an independent investigation of a company’s alleged wrongdoings. I never heard of such a thing occurring.

Look into how IMF (International Monetary Fund) does audits and reviews. They don’t do reports proactively. They do it only when invited by a country.

Yes I know you asked for a company but I gave you country. I’ll update if a company name comes to my mind that did exactly what I suggested.

Obviously not. That’s what I’ve been trying to say. There should be no conflict of interest. It would be exactly the same as what LMG did.

Always follow the money.

Why do you say I tried to change the conversation topic? All my replies are sticking to

1. Independent investigation
2. Crowd-sourced funds (or in its essence, no conflict of interest)

Admittedly my wording could be improved in my original comment in hindsight. What I meant was that there should be no conflict of interest in where the money was coming from. So Linus paying for it is a major conflict of interest. I have provided several links that look into this subject in this post. I recommend that you read them.