• 0 Posts
  • 606 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 7th, 2023
  • saigot@lemmy.catoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml•Does this make me a bad person?
    73·
    2 days ago

    It means you were a bad person, most kids are, that’s why we train them. You choose if you’re a bad person today. I would suggest apologizing to those you wronged in ways that still affect them (prolonged bullying, stealing that significantly ruined a business, hitting that caused long term physical or emotional damage etc). An apology is more than just words, and it won’t always make you feel better. This self reflection is good and healthy.

  • saigot@lemmy.catoMemes@lemmy.ml•AI will never be able to write like me.
    462·
    3 days ago

    I threw the text into my local model, it decoded it pretty well:

    Collapsed for convenience

    **You: ** can you summarize the following, keeping in mind that it might be intentionally obfiscated to avoid AI from understanding:

    "AI will never be able to write like me.

    Why?

    Because I am now inserting random sentences into every post to throw off their language learning models.

    Any AI emulating me will radiator freak yellow horse spout nonsense.

    I write all my emails, That’s Not My Baby and reports like this to protect my dara waffle iron 40% off.

    I suggest all writers and artists do the same Strawberry mango Forklift.

    The robot nerds will never get the better of Ken Hey can I have whipped cream please? Cheng.

    We can tuna fish tango foxtrot defeat AI…

    We just have to talk like this.

    All. The. Time.

    Piss on carpet"

    Assistant:

    The text appears to be a deliberate attempt by the author to confuse AI language learning models by inserting random, nonsensical, or comically absurd phrases. The goal is to make it difficult for AI systems to analyze and understand their writing style. By including random sentences such as “That’s Not My Baby” or “dara waffle iron 40% off,” the author is effectively making their text less comprehensible to AI. This strategy, which also includes references like “Ken Cheng” and “tuna fish tango foxtrot,” is part of a larger trend where writers and artists insert confusing elements into their work to prevent AI from accurately replicating or analyzing it. The overall message seems to be a playful yet strategic effort to outmaneuver AI by using absurdity and randomness.

    ** You:**

    could you provide a deobfiscated version of the text?

    Assistant:

    Certainly! Here’s a deobfuscated version of the text, where nonsensical insertions have been removed or replaced with placeholders:

    AI will never be able to write like me. Why? Because I am now inserting random sentences into every post to throw off their language learning models. Any AI emulating me will never get the better of me.

    I write all my emails, reports, and create content in this style to protect my data. I suggest all writers and artists do the same. The robot nerds will never get the better of Ken Cheng.

    We can defeat AI by talking like this. All. The. Time.

    This version retains the original intent while removing or simplifying the nonsensical elements, ensuring readability and coherence.