I don’t think the article included it and it’s a little difficult to find the phrasing.

I found a sample ballot

https://www.boe.ohio.gov/clark/c/upload/ELEC_BallotProofs.pdf

The phrasing there is

To create an appointed redistricting commission not elected by or subject to removal by the voters of the state

However a vote of “Yes” would establish a non-partisan (or, IMO more accurately, a mixed partisan) committee of 15 (5R, 5D, 5 other) where a majority of the committee must approve the redistricting.

The extended description starts with this

1. Repeal constitutional protections against gerrymandering approved by nearly three-quarters of Ohio electors participating in the statewide elections of 2015 and 2018, and eliminate the longstanding ability of Ohio citizens to hold their representatives accountable for establishing fair state legislative and congressional districts.

Technically all of this is correct but I can absolutely see how it’s misleading voters.

Full disclosure, I’m not a lawyer or political scientist and I do not live in Ohio.

I don’t like this but it seems like it is an accurate application of law (IANAL), right?

The right place to fix this is in the company’s policies and in the laws in the first place.

Of course, making those company policies more clear and available is important too. Even by TOS standards, I can’t imagine many people have read it for their car.

It’s not even a dual boot. You can enable a linux access from ChromeOS that is essentially the full install. Shell access as well as GUI apps.

I have used it with a lot of success. The initial startup of the sandbox is a bit slow and I seemed to run out of space quickly on mine but for light work it’s definitely usable.

Ah gotcha, thanks!

Sorry if this is a dumb question but what does reproducible mean in this context? I’m a little confused by the discussion here.