Germany

Yes, but when they’re called Mohammed, they aren’t real Americans.

I wonder what would clear the bar for sanctioned killing, then.
Witnesses can be enemies of the accused (especially if they’re police), witness memory is notoriously unreliable, photo and video evidence can be faked, DNA only proves someone was present at the crime scene, not what they did, and confessions can be forced.
There is literally no way to prove someone’s guilt 100% unless the jury was present during the murder.

then fire him

only when the evidence is so overwhelming that there is no doubt of guilt.

That’s already the exact bar to clear for every guilty conviction.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-IQLk-LF1JY&t=53

Getting locked in the basement without water, or thrown out into the streets for half a day, when you misbehaved as a child.

I…uh, should probably schedule a doctor’s visit.

If China started selling off their US currency reserves, Trump’s handlers would give him some lube and knee pads, and shove him into a plane to Beijing to apologize.

Yes. They cut out a lot of dialog, and most of the transition to vampires and the final fight.

It could come in handy if you took up archery.

What is it with USA and boob censorship?

The version of From Dusk Till Dawn that aired on German TV with age 16+ rating was half an hour shorter and was cut so badly, it hardly even made sense anymore.
It’s basically just a couple of dude(tte)s going to a gas station, then walking into a bar and starting to shoot at nothing for no reason.

improving load times doesn’t directly impact the bottom line

Depends. In an online store earning $50,000 a day, a one-second delay adds up to more than $1 million in lost sales each year.
https://www.bigcommerce.com/glossary/page-load/

My nipples explode with delight!

With Slackware, that issue doesn’t exist.
Configuration of the current version works exactly the same now as it did when the holy GNU revealed the ten commandmans.

I honestly thought dire wolves were just a made up fantasy species, like owlbears and eagles.

I wonder how many Americans know that this was the reality in Chile, after the USA funded and supported a coup that killed the elected president in the only truly stable and functional democracy of South America at the time, in order to instate a ruthless dictator.

And then it’s a meat sack.

A meat sack is a thing.
And in our system, for every single thing which exists, there is someone who ultimately decides what to do with it. An owner.
This is the question: Who owns this thing?

Why should the relatives of the deceased have the final say on it? Is the corpse their property?

Yes, it makes the most sense for the corpse to be their property, unless the deceased has specified what to do with it instead.
You know, like it’s done with everything else a dead person leaves behind.

If it were, they could choose to take it home and let it rot in the basement. Or cut it into pieces and feed it to dogs. Or use it for target practice, stuff it like a piñata.

No, laws regulate what you can and can’t do with your property.
A gun is your property, but you can’t shoot it wherever, cause it is dangerous.
If you let a corpse rot in your basement or throw it in the woods, that poses a danger to others or the groundwater, so you can’t do that.