Why not both?

std::vector ulUtil {"GNU", "Alpine", "BusyBox", "Toybox"};
int currentUtil = 0;
do
{
	try
	{
		OS(ulUtil[currentUtil], "Linux").use();
	}
	catch (USER::Bored & err)
	{
		currentUtil++;
		continue;
	}
}
while ((currentUtil < ulUtil.size()) || (findMoreUtil(ulUtil)));

Even better, print some anti-empire propaganda.

Give the low-level employee some ideas to quit giving their life to the empire.

This seems to fit all the points I put somewhere else in this thread.

• Nice, glancing angles on the teeth
• Adequate distance between teeth (and unlike mine, the surface between the teeth has been properly smoothed out, making cleaning easier)
• Nice girth on the handle, making hard presses into the object doable without bending the neck
• Despite the girth, the handle shape with properly defined edges, reduces the DEX requirement of the user
  • On top of that, you have chamfers and fillets on those edges, reducing pressure on the skin (which I didn’t even think to ask for)
• None of the form-over-function bs as is done in 2

This is even better than the fork that I have on my table right now.

Though that kink on the back end of the handle seems to trigger my OCD.

I don’t like the bulging teeth in the sides of 5, but I guess that depends more upon what you are eating with it.

I prefer teeth with as acute an angle as viable, so for the front part, I’d go with 2.

The space between the teeth also matters:

• it decides how soft and brittle an object you can pierce with it, without the object breaking down.
• as it decides the variety of objects you can use to clean them.

The fork I use has ~1.5 times the space between teeth as 2

As you said, the handle in 2 is a no. I would be fine with either of 1 and 5 for that.

Though I like 5 for the neck girth of the handle in the 3rd dimension, which would make it last longer and be better for harder stuff, the oval shape seems like it would cause more unwanted turning during use, requiring a higher Dexterity for handling.

While the handle for 3 looks like it would be fine for use, it seems like it would break in ~6 months.

how effective to you think that rule could be enforced?

Easy. Keep some crack shots handy.

Crack open ⇒ Crack shot

And Adobe could make you pay that because they had enough money before, to do the lobbying required to make sure the institutions don’t go FOSS.

Perhaps, would be a nice idea to have some uni that gives both, artistic and programming courses, have the art people interact with software being worked on by the programming people. And they could use any FOSS project for that.
That way everyone gets lots of code to look at and play with, learn skills that otherwise freshers would gravely lack (looking at other’s code) and maybe also get some upstream commits ^[1]. while greatly reducing school fees

Just if the projects had a 10th of the funding of Adobe

You might want to go with “multiplicative inverse”.

Unless you have what it takes to be a celebrity

This is the first time I am knowing of this, that makes it a spoiler.

On the other hand, I don’t plan on playing the game, so I guess it is not a spoiler.

radio waves are magic, and the higher in frequency you go, the darker the magic gets

People getting isekaied: Me gonna get that magicks!

But we have Magic at home! Also Black Magic!

Interesting. Guess I need to check out its UI.
And make sure never to copy that

I remember someone in the Uni hostel having a similar problem.
All they could do was change the jumpiness in their device. It worked though.

Always love to see others making nice house-wide setups.

Maybe someone else griefing because I downvoted some comment of theirs?
Maybe they have Voter ID turned ON, on their server

You just went over 9000% instead!

fancy ASUS router doesn’t have any way

Maybe it’s just the ATPC, that’s why they thought they didn’t need to add the setting.
Mine is a pretty old, cheap 2.4GHz only model from the days when 5GHz had just entered the market.

Sha-ring is Ca-ring

Well, now you do!
I’ll consider myself having done a good deed today :P

I would assume yours does have ATPC, specially if it is an 802.11ac or later standards compliant.

I don’t have much space I roam around in and there’s mobile internet for the mobile anyway.

It was completely unusable. Everyone was jamming everyone else.

The companies deserve all the flak they get in this case. They know it is congested because they are the ones who did it, but don’t care to think about it.

The least they could do is to let the user change the settings, but “oooh nooo PICNIC!”
Ideally they should use a WiFi analyser while setting up the device and if there are too many APs of their own company, send a report to their nearby office so that it can be rectified.