Ok I think this is a misunderstanding about what it means to “have tiktok”. If you mean in the context of your house sure.

But I had this same conversation with my parents. There is no reasonable way to actually prevent a kid from having access to tiktok in some contexts. Parents who say their kids don’t use tiktok because it’s not allowed at home are just incorrect.

My dad doesn’t get that when she hangs out with friends or goes to school, she IS seeing tiktok content.

Seems like we actually agree here though.

deleted by creator

And all of their friends have the same firewalls when they go to hang out?

Not trying to be rude but it seems kinda naive.

My little sister is also not allowed on tiktok but she just uses it on her friend’s phones when they hang out.

Get this Reddit shit out of here

No, mine don’t have tiktok

Bet they do

Ehh, Freemasons are probably not religious in the sense you think they are. They all believe in god but are not necessarily of the same religious background.

Did she kill you?

You’re missing my point I think. Not saying she didn’t make a threat. But WHO specifically did she threaten? Was it a specific person? Was it a group?

Who did she threaten? A spefic person? A group? What makes the judge think this was a credible threat?

His lawyer said there is no evidence he is the shooter.

Actually just looked it up and they same some places that serve this in my state. Probably going tonight.

I’ve eaten crickets. Just not this dish. The ones from the pet store taste bad btw.

Wish there was a place to try this in the US.

Here gunshots just means someone is drunk (US city).

Gunshots? Where do you live that that’s not a regular thing?

Way more likely you are allergic to whatever random flavours are in there than THC itself.

I still have my old Ubuntu CDs no need to worry.

How did you guess?

Idk if you agree as much as happen to have somewhat aligned interests for completely unrelated reasons.

This is such a stupid headline. No one actually thinks it’s anything else.