There is a difference between approaching a solution with “no, it’s not good enough” and “good, now let’s make it better”. It’s not really different if you strip feeling out of it, but in a greater context, that feeling means something.

I agree with your responses, but you’re overall using the former technique. That will rub people wrong and spark conflict.

Rape is an actual crime in the UK, it’s not a crime by name in New Jersey. They’re being consistent with charges based on the jurisdiction.

…is facing at least 10 years in prison if found guilty of first-degree aggravated sexual assault, second-degree sexual assault, and second-degree endangerment to the welfare of a child…

Those are the legal terms for different kinds of rape.

What is this referring to?

Content warnings seem to be useless or add stress

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21677026231186625

Well, this is all very subjective. Idk what you do for a living, but there are massive differences between fact to fact communication and IM/email.

To say it’s outdated is just insane and flat wrong.

Nope.

https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llglrd/2019671031/2019671031.pdf

I cannot tell if you are being serious or just having fun with buzzwords

Seriously, fuck off with the AI shit. At best it’s intelligent regex. And “intelligence” here means a specific thing.

This is how it plays out https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/05/what-happens-presidential-candidate-trump-biden-dies

Less and less over time

That’s fair, and I might have gone more neutral than intended. I was just curious if that fit what was in your head more.

I think I missed that one. Got a case name for it?

Would it be more fair to say: when the music kicks in, the story is being told?

Best time to make a change was 20 years ago. Second best time is now. Progress is progress. Would you rather it continue to not happen?

Bored toddler.

Slouched forward shoulders, weight on my heels, head back with a pained expression and small crying sounds.

This doesn’t feel like news worth anyone’s time…

1: I wholeheartedly believe being a whistleblower is a courageous and brave act. Full stop.

2: drawing conclusions as to why these people decided to speak up when they did without hearing it from them is nonsense.

3: assuming and repeating a John Gresham novel from news articles between corporations and their whistleblowers is not only buying into a conspiracy theory, but is also parroting it.

4: partaking in these conspiratorial shenanigans helps no one and isn’t something to be waved away as harmless - otherwise, what’s the difference here and qanon?

If the “bravery” and admiration comes against the idea of assassination, then it completely matters. Idk why you’re hand waving the nonsense here

I’m on your side dude, the response here is kinda nuts.