YTG123

It’s the other way around: RHEL is a corporate fork of Fedora.

I sometimes wonder if I’m wrong about myself, maybe I am racist in some way but am blind to it. How would I even know?

My stance is that everyone is at least a little racist, in some way. Racism is such an essential part of society and culture, probably almost everywhere by now, that no one can avoid it entirely. However, we can try to recognize it in ourselves and other people and minimize it, and that’s what really makes the difference, the end goal being to eradicate racism entirely (also apply this to all kinds of -isms and -phobias you can think of).

Maybe there are people who have cleansed themselves entirely of racism. In my view, that’s comparable to achieving some sort of enlightened or transcendent state, which most of us can only aspire to.

Was reminded of this article if you’ve got some time to read

but why would I believe that?

No inherent reason to believe that, but seems like lying about this should be illegal. The belief is in Meta’s compliance with the law rather than in its ethics, which, according to these claims, is unfortunately an unfounded belief.

Are H and J compatible?

I can see the instagram version with yt-dlp

That’s an Arabic loan word if I’ve ever seen one

Found the Haskell programmer

Why doesn’t a spectrum imply total ordering? Seems like an ordinary one-dimensional line (of course in reality, sexuality is not just a spectrum either, it’s some high-dimensional space, but I digress…).

Or do I just not know the word spectrum properly?

The Worst Person You Know Just Made A Great Point

If you self-host Bitwarden you can also get the paid tier features

Left foot

I’m the exact opposite: I always try to end on the right foot!

Fortunately, browsers have safeguards against this sort of thing (activating the camera without user interaction)

…right?

Homo ignorans :)

That’s just Mexico’s actual name

I’m not sure how common this is, and I probably need to delve into the literature a bit, but we typically learn that our language has a simple 3-“tense” system (past/present/future). Aside from some obvious exceptions such as a periphrastic past habitual, periphrastic conditional (contrafactual) form, two imperatives and some compounds using the passive participle, I’ve noticed myself using the past and future purely aspectually, such as with present time descriptors.

EDIT: I have since learned that the so-called “future” form is generally interpreted as doing double duty as future and general “modal” (except for the specific cases covered by the conditional and past habitual form). So it really is a future tense, but also used for any kind of modal purpose (intent/command/goal/…), so my aspectual analysis might not be entirely accurate.

We also have historical present (but it’s not good literary style) and whatever the future equivalent of that is named.

Can you give more examples? I’m really curious now

I’m actually not sure how it compares to Israel. Might be close too

It’s not confusing at all, except in the very specific case of nouns referring to people or animals that don’t have gendered variants.

For example, in my language, the word corresponding to “(a) sheep” has a masculine and feminine form, with the feminine used neutrally. Consequently, when seeing “sheep” in English, I assume the feminine and seeing it used with “he” is a bit of cognitive dissonance.

Similarly, most words for human professions are by default masculine.

I can follow this, up to

they are neopronouns

I believe that that’s a decision made by translators of the bible. Hebrew doesn’t have lowercase letters, and the Greek versions of the New Testament that I found don’t capitalize as much. And are they distinct?