• atyaz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    In this thread lots of uninformed people rationalizing why it’s actually okay to use chromium.

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, define “ok” in this context

        Will chrome kill you? No

        Will chrome physically hurt anyone else because you used it? No

        Will the internet become less free if google is able to successfully force this? Yes

        Does using chrome contribute to this? Yes, marginally

        Would as many people as possible switching off of chrome and chromium and onto an alternative help? Yes

        I find this whole thing an interesting argument, as someone who switched from chrome to firefox for extremely unrelated reasons months ago.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          The same people say “boycotts don’t work”. The facepalming here is hard. Welcome to the ad riddled future that you helped make because “people can use what they like” (because it’s being pushed by a huge corporate entity and they want you to use it so they can shove ads down your throat and you should laugh at people who would use anything different)

      • pizza_is_yum@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        True fucking statement.

        Most normal people don’t even know adblockers exist. Guys, if you’re going to convince people to switch away from Chrome, it won’t be on the grounds of protecting against some API or ads.

  • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The past week every post has just been browser icons.

    FFS, go browse the bottom of the Potomac.

      • tubaruco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        if you want a decent browser, there is firefox and basically all its forks and brave

        you shouldnt use brave if

        • you dont want to support google, as brave is based on chromium
        • you dont want to support the people behind it, as there are some people who say theyre bad people but i got no clue if its true

        i dont like chromium so ill stick with firefox (and mullvad browser), even though im still technically supporting google since most of mozillas revenue is from google (though i believe it is better since its not software made by google)

        • Honestly, it’s mostly my comfort using chromium browsers (specifically chrome) for dev. I know the Firefox dev tools are way better than they used to be, but that’s one more thing to sink time into when I could instead just get things done lol.

          But, it’s about that time.

  • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It feels like last week we were defending proprietary software, ads, and tracking against those mean old FOSS zealots who actually care about privacy and freedom. Are you saying we care about those things now?

    • eldain@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We now know how much we do or don’t care about these things, based on all arguments provided. Some people might even give firefox a try after last week, which is great. I’m saying we have seen enough memes full of browser logo’s for now.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of panics turn out to be nothing, or nowhere near as bad as people thought. No reason I can’t wait until it happens to move.

        • Phrodo_00@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you wait enough websites will start requiring WEI and changing to a browser without it will just click you out of them

    • SootySootySoot [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read about Google already making it deliberately more difficult for addons to block under-the-hood trackers; do some ads not slip through uBlock on Chrome already nowadays?

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t use uBlock. I use AdBlock. I also have a setting to let non-intrusive ads through, because that has an influence, even if a small one, on making the internet more tolerable for everyone else.

        Before I turned that on, there were always some ads that slipped through on occasion. No biggie, there’s a manual block button. No adblocker is perfect.

    • fylkenny@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess because of the web environment integrity API proposed by Google. It enables your browser to tell the website it hasn’t installed AdBlock or any other undesired add on. This is marketed as improving security, but will mainly be used to block browsers which block adds.

      • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And big plus for google: it can be extended very well. The site sees any extension installed, if the browser is headless. So only google can use bots in the future and can rake in all the ai training profits and sell all the searchengine ads.

        Wei is a lot more than ad block control.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not just open to Google and it doesn’t stop there either. Amazon could refuse to work if you’re on a phone and don’t have their app, or it could tell you to uninstall the Alibaba app before using

          The possibilities are endless, and all benefits to be had are on the corporate side

          • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I knew there‘d be some people with actual knowledge of the matter. Thanks for mentioning it.

      • XTornado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean for some rare specific usages it could be usefull like ensuring bank webpages integrity or similar but mostly and the main usage would be for what you said.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t though - it basically ensures your device settings.

          Is that integrity? Maybe - if the attester code is flawless and handles all situations perfectly, it could theoretically add to integrity, but that’s not a realistic outcome

          It’s not designed for that. It can only block the site - it doesn’t add to security, it takes away from it.

          Say a bank designs their own attester - suddenly you have code that, if compromised, is always run in the most privileged execution context, in a way the user can’t control right before you enter your bank password

  • eldain@feddit.nlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    And thus the brave lammings set out to inform other lemmings, who are as tech savvy and know this is happening, that this is happening by posting memes. Hopefully the people, who would already be using firefox if they cared, switch to firefox so we can breach the 3% market share and that’ll show Google, maker of Chrome and Firefox’ main sponsor, people care enough to stop this madness! - I’m not against activism, but activism in an echochamber can turn into a circlejerk. Everyone stop stroking please… I’m here for the memes.

    • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not against activism

      You just spent like 5 minutes reducing activism to “cIrClEjErK”. Can we leave that stupid ass phrase on reddit for Christ’s sake?

      • eldain@feddit.nlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just look at all the people in the comments patiently explaining what the problem is and what can be done. At what point would you consider this common knowledge that is propagated and confirmed because people on this plattform have reached consensus? It is good we had this discussion for a few days, plenty of awareness has been spread on lemmy. I’m proposing to stop posting about this topic as there is nothing new added except repetition that gains traction because we agree. Call that whatever you want.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re not wrong that this discussion would be more productive in a privacy community or one dedicated to web browsers, but at least people see it here.

          The problem I’ve seen isn’t the discussion, but the fact that some users have become disproportionately hostile toward others, using childish insults to describe their ideas like “stupid” instead of contributing anything of value.

  • Kayn@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox stans are some of the most annoying people.

    Yes, I know I’m contributing to a Chromium monopoly, thank you for telling me. Firefox just doesn’t do the things I need my browser to do.

      • Kayn@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Off the top of my head:

        • Tab tiling
        • Multi-level tab bars
        • Workspaces
        • Automatic session backups
        • Sidebar panels
        • Spotlight-like global search
        • Commands to toggle parts of the Ul
        • Custom toolbar buttons
        • macniel@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m pretty sure that all of that are from extensions you would have installed for chrome?

          Spotlight-like global search

          Whats that supposed to mean? That you can use macOS Spotlight to search the web with? Yeah same thing with firefox, atleast under linux.

          Commands to toggle parts of the Ul

          Like pressing F12 for fullscreen?

          Custom toolbar buttons

          Like themes?

          • Kayn@dormi.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m pretty sure that all of that are from extensions you would have installed for chrome?

            No? Chrome isn’t the only web browser in existence.

            Whats [Spotlight-like global search] supposed to mean?

            That I can bring up a search bar that’ll search my history, closed tabs, bookmarks, open tabs, the web and more all at once.

            Like pressing F12 for fullscreen?

            Not only that, also selectively hiding the tab bar, address bar or specific sidebar panels.

            Like themes?

            No, like custom toolbar buttons that do custom things when clicked.

    • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Out of those who actually give a reason for this position, which is practically no one, it’s almost always “vertical tabs”. Apparently those people can’t use a search engine since there are multiple easily found extensions available that make FF do vertical tabs.

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      LMFAO, you’re an idiot. There’s nothing chrome can do that FF can’t do better.

      • Kayn@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Who said anything about Chrome?

        You verbally abuse me and hallucinate things I didn’t even mention. You’re exactly the kind of person I was talking about.

      • Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        @JokeDeity @HKayn, Tab groupings, PWAs, hibernate inactive Tabs, vertical tabs, casting on desktop, workspaces, compatibility with some webs, vertical tabs… well, maybe with a ton of extensions…

        • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oooooof, it’s amazing you couldn’t come up with a single thing that actually is true. Firefox can do all of that.