• Endorkend@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 years ago

      Most valuations by actual economists and the like was in the 20-25B range. So it still lost a 5x in value, which is only marginally worse than 10x.

      Meanwhile, you have the Elon fanboys still pretending Twitter is doing better than it ever has.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The point of acquiring Twitter wasn’t to make money; it was to take away something that woke lefty journalists like and give it to fascists.

      • grte@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Have you considered that Elon Musk is a dumbass rather than a super genius?

        The guy didn’t plan on buying twitter. He was made to after he tried gaming the system and fucked it up.

  • Someguy89@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can this man baby just go away? No one cares dude. Enjoy your overpriced echo chamber.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 years ago

      Him buying twitter was just some sort of narcissistic flex on his daughter.

    • TheObserver@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Put another rich guy in charge of spacex first please! I don’t want to be stuck on this rock forever 🥲

      • Zeragamba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        luckily, he has minimal influence over SpaceX, and only really provide high level direction. Same with Tesla.

        Twitter, though… the turnaround time on his whims is staggering

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Considering the fuckupery at Tesla (especially as of late), this may not entirely be true. It seems that he has slightly more influence at Tesla than he does at SpaceX, which has been doing a pretty great job.

  • darq@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    When you have a net worth measured in the billions of dollars, it’s genuinely impressive to be able to lose money. With that kind of sum behind your name, you could just do nothing and out-earn most people on the planet with just interest alone. To actually be able to lose money? Now that takes work!

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Since Elon is just flushing money down the toilet do you think he might do me a solid and slice me off like 50k? Brah, that’s like if I dropped a penny on you from my last paycheck, right? I ain’t even getting greedy.

      Like he could do that for 800,000 people and it would just be buying twitter, right?

  • IronHighway@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    On one hand, I can’t wait for his empire to crumble and on another hand, I don’t want to see this many Elon/X/Tesla links about something so seemingly useless.

    • Bernie Ecclestoned@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      My guess is he launched Tesla in China and wanted a WeChat clone, and as he has bought pretty much every company rather than founded them, he just thought it was rinse repeat.

  • YMS@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Does Elon Musk really believe that X is now worth $4 billion, as his scorching post suggests? Maybe not.

    Well, maybe I just read another article wildly blowing up a story based on a tweet Elon Musk spent 4 seconds thinking about.