I don’t know if I’m going crazy but looking at the current situation in the world … please tell me that I’m overexagurating

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Please seek therapy or counseling. If your concern that a war is on the horizon is affecting you this much then we aren’t qualified to help.

  • SparrowHawk@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I think that the true world war 3 will not be nations against nations, but citizens against their own nations. The stage is set for an actual paradigm shift or system annihilation. We will not support civilization if it doesn’t change, either the people destroy the pyramid or the pyramid will destroy the world.

    • Danitos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I kinda doubt that will happen. For instance, look at Venezuela: Venezuelans are beyond fed up with Maduro’s dictatorship, but there’s nothing they can do against the government forces.

      Governments will do anything they can to prevent a paradigm change.

      • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What revolution really takes is soldier’s that are protecting the system being unwilling to kill when the “rebels” are their family and friends.

        If soldiers have love for the people and see common cause more than they fear their leaders then the leader can fall.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    please tell me that I’m overexagurating

    You’re overexaggerating.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Nah, there won’t be WW3. Instead we get countries sabotaging each other via hacking critical infrastructure, proxy wars, propaganda, trade wars.

    I doubt there will ever be a direct “hot war” between the top five nuclear powers ever again.

    WW3 is not what’s gonna kill people, climate change is more likely gonna be humanity’s downfall.

  • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    In 2001 there was that 9/11 thing and it sounded like WW3 had just started. Turns out, it didn’t. Well, lots of things did happen as a result of it, but WW3 wasn’t one of them. Soon after that, USA was involved in a number if wars in the middle east and it felt like WW3 had just started. Again, it didn’t. Some time around 2010s the tension between North Korea and South Korea was getting pretty intense, and a friend of mine started talking WW3… As usual, WW3 didn’t start.

    At the moment, the situation in Ukraine feels just like all the other major incidents, but we’ll see how it works out. If you expose your mind to tabloid journalism, it begins to feel like the entire world is about to explode. History has a tendency of repeating itself, so I suggest reading about the things that lead to WW1 and WW2. Once, you’ve done that, you’ll begin to pay attention to certain signs and start ignoring most of the nonsense tabloids keep writing about.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      That’s just survivorship bias, you didn’t live through the worlds where all those things escalated into flat out war, you dimension skipping hippie.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The situation today is nowhere near as bad as the Cold War.

    Think of it this way. All of the 0.01%ers in china, USA and Russia share the same tastes and values. Think any of them are really hot to blow up their nice places on the Rivera?

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Anything could happen of course, but I don’t see this as a likely scenario myself. What’s more likely is that we return to bloc competition similar to what we saw during the Cold War. Except this time it’s going to be G7 against the BRICS.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I highly doubt that WWIII will happen (within the next few years), however I forsee the next several years to not be peacful. There will be several (regional/civil) despites that will most likley occur and the chances of any of them escalating is highly unlikley. Here are the conflicts I forsee:

    • Continued Syrian Civil War: wont be pretty but escalation is unlikely
    • Palestinian occupation: Will absolutely continue to be horrific but none of the neighboring Arab counties care enough to escalate (or risk US aid)
    • Russia/Ukraine war: Russia will get some territory and thats about it, probrally just the Russian majority areas. After that the EU will intimidate Russia to back off.
    • India/China border dispute: They’ll make a lot of noise, actural fighting is unlikely
    • US/Canada/Mexico/Greenland conflict: Who knows tbh, most likley Trump is running off his mouth as always
    • China/Taiwan: I severly doubt it, in addition the US is moving microchip manufacturing to the US so strategic value may loosen

    Worst case scenario here is a full blown war between the EU and Russia, the US likley wont get involved (Trump doesnt care about Europe) and neither will China (both counties might send aid respectively). It would probrally end with Russia surrendering followed by them loosing no land and maybe a regime change plus some political reforms.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Russia/Ukraine war: Russia will get some territory and thats about it, probrally just the Russian majority areas. After that the EU will intimidate Russia to back off.

      How do you imagine the EU will do that exactly? The EU has no military industrial capacity to speak of, it doesn’t have access to cheap energy, and it’s becoming politically unstable. A far more likely scenario here is that the EU starts breaking up, and nationalist parties start realigning their countries towards Russia because the US will leave EU to hang.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Russia/Ukraine war: Russia will get some territory and thats about it, probrally just the Russian majority areas. After that the EU will intimidate Russia to back off.

      This is one may cool down. Definitely would not have under Harris. This is the big ww3 fear.

      India/China border dispute: They’ll make a lot of noise, actural fighting is unlikely

      They have resolved their territorial dispute, or at least made a major agreement that mostly resolves it.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    No.

    Russia (the current primary aggressor) is on the brink of a banking system collapse. It doesn’t have the money to wage war on a bigger scale than it already is.

    China is far more interested in trade than hostilities.

    The middle east has been a tinder box for over a hundred years. I don’t see it dragging outsiders into it and hopefully we have a respite coming.

    Central Asia has tension between India and Pakistan, but that’s nothing new. India could piss off China or the reverse, and if that kicked off the loss of life could be on a scale that would be unprecedented but still I think it wouldn’t drag the west in.

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Sorry if i misinterpreted your comment but saying that the middle east has been a tinder box for century feel like it alluding that other regions like Europe has less conflicts and is less prone to violence

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Star Trek says that we shouldn’t expect World War 3 until 2026, so we’ve got 1 more year to live to the fullest before then.