• peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Aren’t those things from the 60s?

    I get nervous when I’m on a Boeing or a MD from the 90s, Im amazed a plane that old still has enough working components

    Or had at least

    • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Airplanes have very particular maintenance schedules. Some things are based on the amount of hours flown, others are calendar items on a set schedule. They are also periodically stripped down completely to check every last part.

      Basically, every critical component on it will have been recently replaced, overhauled or checked. If done correctly, a 50 year old plane is not inherently more dangerous because of its age. The caveat to that being: if it’s done properly.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You think that 727 you flew in last was built in the 90s? Heh, you don’t want to know how old they are. I’ll just say this, those passenger jets cost millions of dollars and airlines don’t like to throw things out. Ever.

      A private twin engine plane could literally be built any time in the last 50 years, could be brand new too. That doesn’t mean it isn’t airworthy though, being old wouldn’t make it unreliable.

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Man I flew on a DC-10 or MD-90 direct flight across the country in 2015.

        I can’t remember what happened at landing but it wasn’t fun .