• superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    So… Your point is the 2004 ranger is smaller, and makes the 2024 ranger look bigger because it’s so much smaller?

    Good work agreeing with me while trying to be clever but entirely misusing the idea of forced perspective.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No the whole point is to show how idiotic it is to use a picture to base your opinion on the dimensions of objects.

      • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t personally use a picture, because I’ve been outside in the past few years and can literally see the difference in real life. I was suggesting pictures for you, so you can correct yourself and understand what people are talking about in this thread, since you haven’t been outside yet in your life.