• reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That's *always* the case.

      Maybe there’s a reason for that. The word “enshitification” doesn’t exist in a void.

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean, they could stop messing with things that aren’t broken for once…

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Eh, it’s a fine line tbh. Not that I enjoy defending Google.

        You get both “this UI hasn’t changed in a decade” and “this UI is perfect never change it” in relatively equal amounts. The rest honestly don’t care either way.

        • NRay7882@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          2 days ago

          Imagine if they actually brought back “options” and let you choose between changes rather than force them on you.

          • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            That would turn into spaghetti code and unmaintainable tech debt really fast. Now every time you make a change you have to make sure it doesn’t break previous stylesheets, or you need to run different versions of the same codebase for each stylesheet that will need updating for security vulnerabilities and stakeholder whims.

            • AugustWest@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Not really. At least if you plan to have it customizable in the first place.

              • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Then it becomes harder to change when you want to add in new features still. There needs to be a fine balance between giving options and having a clean single-option code, and offering 2 different video players is not it (it sounds like some shortcuts got broken so it’s not just a CSS that got applied)

                • AugustWest@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You are right. I forgot we were talking about a web front end, and I was think of an application. I take it back.

                  I am just so used to watching you tube with applications on desktop and mobile I forgot we were talking about you tubes new web front end.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because the seek bar overlaps the video as it is playing, and because the drag button is huge whenever you mouseover it, it is much harder to locate chapter marker visually.

      Change for the sake of change is not good.