• Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Didn’t they just have two or three drone crashes within minutes of takeoff recently, not sure I really trust Amazon with this stuff.

  • last_philosopher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Let’s count the problems:

    1. Up front cost
    2. Maintenance cost
    3. Varied problems like different types of stairs, tripping hazards, etc.
    4. People attacking or stealing robots and their packages.
    5. Safety issues with 100+ pound metal robots falling on pets and children

    Any others?

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    No they fucking aren’t. That shit would be so much more expensive than a person. Liars, and not even particularly good ones.

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I mean apparently they’re partnering with a private robotics company. The picture is an actual model of the company’s robot. Whether or not they actually end up implementing this, they’re allegedly currently training the robots.

      Presumably, if nothing else, Amazon/Bezos is probably getting some sweet federal kick backs to attempt this and further the current administration’s agenda to beat “Gyna” in the science and tech race. Except unlike Gyna, the U.S. is firing all of their scientists (which, until Jan. 2025, was one area that the U.S. had unquestionably dominated China) bc they think AI can replace them too.

      So now, they’re just handing all the resources to the kind of technocratic “elites” who are used to just purchasing their good ideas, rather than actually creating anything. This is also why they seem to genuinely believe something like Amazon humanoids is a sound investment, “durr, we don’t need people bcuz we haz robots.”

      Fun fact, just learned they are indeed going to try to replace scientists with robots too. There was a meeting about it yesterday:

      For all we know they made the futuristic robot exoskeleton, took some fancy pictures of it holding a package, and that’s all she wrote. The end result is just some rich assholes are slightly richer at the expense of the tax payer, and we should be grateful. 'Merica! 🇺🇲

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Amazon/Bezos is probably getting some sweet federal kick backs

        I think it’s more a threat against employees. The robots can be used as scabs.

        which, until Jan. 2025, was one area that the U.S. had unquestionably dominated China

        China had more scientists and papers well before this year. And China dominates particularly in fields like maths, computer science and manufacturing.

        they are indeed going to try to replace scientists with robots

        I can actually think of a lot of uses for robots in research. And, of course, there are a lot of robots in labs already; they just don’t look like humans.

        • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          More scientists and data, but research quality in China has been very poor for quite some time, hence a lot of questions and concerns regarding methods, data collection, and number of retracted articles.

          The entire idea of the “China virus” and the Trump/Republicans lab leak/attack on NIH funding to EcoHealth, and their collaboration with Wuhan Institute of Virology, hinged on pointing out the lack of lab safety standards in China that wouldn’t have allowed the research to occur here.

          On the flip side, now that Trump is in power, OSTP is focused on removing regulations to science and tech bc they argue they are slowing us down in the AI race against China.

          Kinda seems like a load of BS especially considering AI data in China is very poor likely bc of the lack of regulations

          https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2024/8/9/china-wrestles-with-quantity-over-quality-in-generative-ai-patents

    • feddup@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Just like when they were going to replace all their delivery drivers with drones. It’s just bullshit.

    • atticus88th@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The robot dogs police are starting to use has a two big red buttons, one on the face and one on the ass. Just jam your finger or pointer end of your rifle and it returns to station or shuts down.

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I feel like we’re going to end up with more laws protecting robots and surveillance cameras than our own civil liberties.

      Wonder where all those angry white guys with tiki torches and khaki shorts are now? The ones that thought the Jews were trying to replace them? 🤔

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It is the distant future,
    The year 2000,

    The last known survivor lives is a cave somewhere in the Madagascar desert. A robot travels by foot to deliver a package. A simple letter with the following URL:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvFZjo5PgG0

    The survivor dies. Amazon has finally won. They have all the money and everyone else is gone. All robots shut down. Besos jumps into the money pile only to learn that cartoons don’t work in reality as most of his bones become powder on impact. The world is silent for a second. In the distance two flies are doing it over a pile of cow dung. The world becomes a peaceful place with no human presence whatsoever.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yo why tf can’t they just fucking pay people a reasonable wage AND give them sane working conditions? This is insane. Capitalism does not favor anyone except the rich. It’s time to tear down this wall of mediocrity and face the facts. No sense of government intervention will fix this. It must all be rewritten entirely.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because it’s not real. It’s purely for marketing, not for actual wide-spread implementation.

      Even in the best of cases, even factoring in economy of scale and all that, a robot like that will cost upwards of €50k at least, probably closer to double that, will require constant maintainance, and the risk of vandalism or accidental damage is really high. And you’ll likely need a (skilled) human operator nearby anyway, because the delivery vehicle doesn’t drive itself.

      The purpose of projects like this is marketing and public perception.

      • The company looks futuristic and future proof. That’s good to get investors.
      • The company looks like they could replace humans with robots at any time. That’s good with negotiations with unions and workers.
      • The company gets into headlines worldwide. That’s advertisement they don’t have to pay for.

      This robot is not meant to ever go mainstream. Maybe there will be a handful of routes where they will be implemented for marketing purposes, but like drone delivery and similar gimmicks, it won’t beat a criminally underpaid delivery human on price, and that’s the only metric that counts for a company like Amazon.

  • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    This makes me wonder what the benefit of bipeds are for this over something like iBot’s multi wheel design. I get it makes sense for rubble or debris, but for halls and stairs multi wheel seems better and more refined.

    Edited for autocorrect.

  • black0ut@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If I get one of those, I’m definitely killing it and stealing its copper. Amazon can pay for the repairs.

  • xektop@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So, from what little research I did the robots cost from 5000$ to 500000$, as most articles point out the advanced robots cost 200000-300000$. In a lot of places around the world that’s like paying a human for 8-10 years. Humans are easily “replaceable”, where those robots have maintenance cost additional to the initial “investment”. How is that feasible in the eyes of the big money oligarchs? I genuinely don’t understand the end goal here.

    • lazyViking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes, because nothing new is ever reduced in price and improved upon after research phase is finished

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The labor aspect of class politics is complicated.

      But you don’t have to understand any of it to think stealing these would be cool as fuck.

        • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The only ‘delivery guy’ i ever met who got paid even close to six figures (and that doesn’t include operation+maintenance) spoke like a million languages, had advice for how much to bribe border guards in various countries and currencies, most of which no longer exist, and may have had ties to the state department.

          And i feel like thats not the kind of delivery guy amazon is trying to replace with these.

    • mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I don’t think they really plan to replace workers with robots. It fulfills two other purposes:

      • Keep the work force humble by threatening them with permanent replaceability.
      • Keep the stock holders happy. This shit simulates “innovation” like the delivery drones 10 years ago.
      • MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        if its actually feasible and it reduces cost, then it will be the plan. right now though, its bullshit. As soon as people start stealing and destroying these 5000-500000 dollar robots all of the potential profit goes out the window.

        • mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I may lack imagination but I can’t see a future where the materials and skills needed to build such robots get cheap enough to replace humans.
          Especially if they get trashed and stolen every once in a while.

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Even if you make them in large quantities, material cost alone will be at least €50k. You will need a skilled operator nearby, and constant maintainance, and if you lose even one per year, a regular underpaid human worker will be much cheaper.

            These things are pure marketing devices to pacify investors, generate headlines and make unions and workers afraid.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 hours ago

    everyone knows its just going to be indians in a data center in india controlling the bots.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I tend to disbelieve this, mainly because a humanoid robot would be overkill. Custom-purpose robots would be much cheaper to design, build and maintain, with fewer potential failure points.

    • crimsonpoodle@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Eh I dunno there’s so much infrastructure that is human centric; if you could make a humanoid robot it could easily traverse all the human designed places

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        The main problem is walking on unpredictable terrain, which spidery or doggy robots can do with fewer balance issues than two-legged humanoid ones.

        • trashboat@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Also doors and gates

          They may also have concluded that the public finds a humanoid robot more acceptable than those cube 4-wheeled robots that never took off that people like to tip and kick over and stuff

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bro that is so gonna get HitchBot’ed

    a photo was tweeted, showing that the robot had been stripped “beyond repair” and decapitated in Philadelphia. The robot was located by some people following its progress on its website. The head was never found.

    Also, like… if you wanna replace human workers, fine, just give us the UBI.

    Otherwise, riots would be justified.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    humanoid robot: dances

    amazon: shock

    humanoid robot: makes coffee

    amazon: shock

    humanoid robot: delivers package

    amazon: friendly shock