Three years ago, as OpenAI’s ChatGPT was making its splashy debut, a Pew Research center survey found that nearly one in five Americans saw AI as a benefit rather than a threat. But by 2025, 43 percent of U.S. adults now believe AI is more likely to harm them than help them in the future, according to Pew.

1 in 5 people seeing something as positive is not a high approval rating in the beginning.

Once again, Sweden’s good PR helps them dodge a shot.

Hopefully epi-pens

Ah but a bailout package is different. That’s a display of powerful capitalism. A private company so powerful it can’t be allowed to fail and a government so strong it won’t allow it to fail.

We can always cook you if you like.

It’ll make you curl up like you’ve been hunched over your computer desk for decades.

Most fashionable mushroom I’ve ever seen.

You do realise that Labour were voted in as the progressive alternative on a bunch of pretty progressive campaign pledges right? The Online Safety Act and treating peaceful protesters as terrorists certainly weren’t what people voted for.

It is equal in legality as throwing one sub at an ICE agent.

Not really a shitpost when it’s just highlighting a very real form of open corruption in the USA…

I would like to propose you eat my gas

You’re not going to catch me out with this one again!

I am enjoying the riceballs much more than the Presidential idiocy randomiser.

Just because the person with 2 injured arms is on the train, it doesn’t mean I’m obliged to perform his mother’s duties.

Oh my, G-SHOCK and NFTs! I never could have imagined I’d feel warm fuzzy nostalgia about such a thing.

I’d gladly go back to NFTs at this point

You can find those regardless of gender or orientation!

Because then she wouldn’t be pointing at the cat.

Well I’m glad we cleared that position up. Now if you could just explain how we grade levels of suffering and in particular which one is more real than the others. Maybe even grade every type of suffering, so we can all see which one is offensive to compare to the other type of suffering. Maybe we should lay out a description for “propaganda” too.

I had you tagged as “confidently incorrect” for some reason from a long time ago, so thanks for confirming that’s still valid.