• snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    21 hours ago

    That is the intent, to make it harder for any challenges to Republican fascism. If a case comes up that would benefit them, then they will do it as a exception, becsuse they are hypocrites.

    Basically they have ruled that rights only count in the scope they want, and by default it is limited. Fascist laws and executive orders can be enforced nationwide and only challenged locally.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Unless I’m getting my right wing “shadowy organizations” mixed up, it was the now well known heritage foundation that created the short list of judges for Republicans to choose from for something like the last 40 years, so these are all their judges, and looking at project 2025 we know what the heritage foundation wants for the country…

      It’s not rainbows and ponies that’s for sure.

    • thedruid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Our bureaucracy was already over taxed. This grinds much of it to a halt. Which is all they need

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      This goes all the way back to Lincoln who’s primary reasoning for deciding to start a civil war was we couldn’t let states decide if they would or would not be slave states, slavery was wrong this isn’t an option - now “slavery” has a bigger and more nuisanced meaning but I essentially his decision to disallow states to choose on such important subjects, to not be united is being removed