LX Pontual
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years ago

Bye, Felicia

slrpnk.net

message-square
19
fedilink
660

Bye, Felicia

slrpnk.net

Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
19
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • N0body@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Terrible parenting. If you’re going to go to the trouble of yeeting your baby at least do it properly with a baby trebuchet.

    • infinull@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Seriously, you could yeet it at least 300m that way, maybe more since they’re less than 90kg.

  • Cap@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    Missing rung on lower end causes baby to slip out prior to launch half the time. Launch distance is subpar compared to other yeet machines.

    I know it was made for Victorian babies but mine is Edwardian. One out of five stars, would not recommend.

    • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, the stars are saying this is the right way. And they can’t be wrong.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    On the other side of the room

  • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is just an old-school rocker / bouncer, no? It looks like it’s meant to “float” the child like a one-sided sea-saw?

    I guess if you pulled it all the way down and released, it could slightly yeet the child, but there are absolutely better contraptions if going for distance

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah it is, it’s just funny with the caption

  • kakler bitmap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Bratapult

  • Moof@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Throws out all of the baby, and none of the bathwater. Saves hundreds on water bills!

  • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Woudn’t having a spring under it be more efficient than a weird bent strap? I can’t imagine it would launch the baby too far.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      Weird bent strap is called a “leaf spring.”

      • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ah, thanks for the knowledge! Is it stronger than a twisty spring?

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Eh they make em of all varying sizes and strengths, just kind of a “use the right one for the job” situation I think.

          • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Ah yes, you can choose to throw the baby into dad’s arms or out of the window.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Well I meant more like “eject a spent shell casing” or “suspension in your whole ass car,” but yeah lol.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      They didn’t have such advanced spring technology back then.

      It’s still inferior to the medieval baby trebuchet.

      • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah but the baby trebuchet is how we got all this stork nonsense, we can’t go back to random babies dropping from the clouds.

        • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          random babies dropping from clouds is no way to form a government!

  • HerrKai@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Brand new sentence!

Memes@lemmy.ml

memes@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 981 users / day
  • 3.3K users / week
  • 9.83K users / month
  • 23.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 50.2K subscribers
  • 12.8K Posts
  • 227K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org