Quick everyone do their banking on it!

“Make believe doing to us.”

They invent a world of bogeymen so that they can do exactly what they make-believe the other side is doing. “They make-believe do it, so it’s just fair if I do it.”

It’s still early. We’re only 2 months and 1 week in.

So you sympathize with the poster and come to his defense because you share his same characteristics. Kinda figured there was some of that. You should take his life lesson. Ciao.

We’re at 2 months 1 week.

Pop goes the trampoline as he drives his bill into the fabric.

Jump on it.

From a different article:

New York has, however, enacted a “shield law” that forbids state officials from extraditing abortion providers to other states or complying with out-of-state court orders. In his statement refusing to enforce the Texas fine, acting Ulster county clerk Taylor Bruck cited the law.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/27/new-york-abortion-pill-lawsuit-texas-fine

Maybe just take the criticism and move on?

Ditto.

Me: “vote”.

You: “you’re not helping”

Unbelievable.

This is telling people to vote. (for Dems.) Because this is what happens when you vote otherwise.

https://youtu.be/PuFIs7OkzYY

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters. Congratulations!

We didn’t see anything from Derek. The only source of info was the person in the group chat. He had the incentive to downplay everything 1) what happened in the group, and 2) the reaction. And it was horrendous on all fronts, and that’s when he’s likely playing it down big time.

I have no idea why you’re so weirdly adamant on defending this person that you’re twisting yourself into nonsensical pretzels. Ciao.

It’s not a protest, it’s national strategy.

What I’m saying is the person posting (the person in the group) has every incentive to downplay it as much as they can. And the description was still fucking horrendous. I’m not assuming, I’m observing the interests.

You can look at the descriptors they chose to use, and that’s very likely playing it down big time. I’m betting it was extremely bad.

At the point of sharing photos and Photoshopping someone to ridicule them, this isn’t an offhand comment said in frustration. This is planned and executed ridicule and mockery. He’s exposing them because he thought their “friends” should know who they are and what they are doing. Not for the intent of “hurting everyone else involved intentionally due to a sense of self righteousness”. Whether you agree with what he thought or not, it’s not narcissism (by itself).

It’s also super bizarre that you want privacy for them when they are fucking sharing photos (the context reading they were private) and sharing “raunchy texts”. Where was the privacy for their victims huh? They deserve what they got.

“Hmmm should I expose all the offensive photoshops and derogatory things they did said about specific people?” No that’s not narcissist by itself.

I heard there’s a tariff on those Canadian pins and badges.