Backwater? Growing power?

    • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      China, and maybe some other Asian countries have a household registration ( hukou 户口) system.

      Only people born into the system get to exist for things like schools, national insurance, etc.

      So any unofficially born second children (or hidden first born daughters) didn’t get to legally count under this.

      Also; children born out of marriage don’t exist for state schools or benefits, either.

      Where your hukou is limits your options for access to housing, claims on social security and health insurance, and the like. Mostly if you were born into a very rural area your only pathway to legally having a place to live and for your children to go to school in another part of the country is via university graduation.

      There are pushes to change this system, and smaller cities are removing their requirements for non-rural hukou. But Beijing, Shanghai, and other cities you have probably heard of are yet to do this.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        https://www.newsweek.com/china-hiding-population-secret-1926834

        The 2000 census came up short, so officials launched a campaign to add tens of millions of “missing” people, bringing the official population close to initial estimates, Yi said. But a closer look at demographics showed a glaring disparity, Yi said. Around 164.24 million babies were born between 1991 and 2000. After accounting for these births and subtracting deaths and net migration, there were about 40 million fewer Chinese than reported.

        They killed so many girls the population fell more than expected.

        • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Did you read that article, or just post the first news link you found with a headline that agreed with you?

          ‘No Evidence’ “Dr. Yi is an early and courageous individual to criticize China’s harmful birth control policies,” said Feng Wang, sociology professor at the University of California, Irvine.

          But Wang disputes Yi’s conclusions. “Scholars in China and at the U.N. have analyzed these and other data. Not a single person has ‘discovered’ such a huge discrepancy.”

          Everyone agrees to not accept China’s figures, but no one can find anywhere near such a big gulf. And you’d think that if they could, more US and Taiwanese sources would be reporting on it, wouldn’t they?

    • Pronell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      My point was more that some people did the right thing, not that it’s enough to eliminate a statistical slump.

      Some people of the time would think the Chinese were heartless people to do what they did, and some quietly raised their other children, that’s all.

      And if even that isn’t true, so be it, as I could have fallen for propaganda and cannot locate the original source, but here is another showing that some people didn’t just fall in line.