• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    that looks pretty good. any chance i can get that nice webui for management on regular debian?

    • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Honestly, it seems pretty similar to cockpit which should be available in most distros repos.

    • d_k_bo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as MOS, is in fact, MOS/GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, MOS plus GNU plus Linux. MOS is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU/Linux system made useful by the Linux kernel, GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

    • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s built on top of Devuan which is a fork of Debian which uses Linux.

      Apparently Devuan is “Debian without systemd”. 🤡🤡🤡

      I would stay away! systemd provides so many well-designed APIs that are helpful for server management.

      Also most projects that promote not using systemd are weird ideologues at this point.

      • dx1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Also most projects that promote not using systemd are weird ideologues at this point.

        I guess literally anyone who knows it’s a bloated idiosyncratic pile of garbage which introduces unnecessary attack surface. Guessing you’ve never used any of the alternate modern init systems.

        I maintain all kinds of crap, some systemd, some non-systemd, some straight up busybox. Systemd is not easier to use for almost any of my use cases. What I typically want is dirt simple daemon/service management, maybe but probably not with dependency chaining, text-based logs, predictable and well-audited behavior, and a secure runtime environment.

      • Stilic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I would stay away! systemd provides so many well-designed APIs that are helpful for server management.

        Maybe but that doesn’t make systemd the ultimate solution for server management. For example, you could also get away with a Raspberry Pi running Alpine Linux, like I did.

        Also most projects that promote not using systemd are weird ideologues at this point.

        I’m kinda mixed on this but I see your point. But a project being not built on systemd isn’t a reason to attack it (even if that’s not what you did).

  • ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Third time’s a charm for Vyatta/eBox?

    I don’t see any paid support subscriptions yet, so maybe it’ll work this time.