• Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t forget that you can give it a face and tell it to describe a blowjob to you and tell you you’re loveable.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      My man out here asking for $500B $1T $2T to build Datacenter God and people just keep giving him blank checks because he made a series of bad Vines.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      What’s a normal amount? What proportion of people with Dropbox or Google Docs or Hotmail are paying customers?

      Having a little over 1% doesn’t seem that bad, I am faar more surprised that over 1% of users pay for ChatGPT (if your numbers are accurate).

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What proportion of people with Dropbox or Google Docs or Hotmail are paying customers?

        Dropbox is nice enough to list it.

        They have 700m users, and 18m of them pay for the service, so about double of OpenAI. Completely unlike OpenAI, however, they make quite a bit of profit, having a revenue of 2.55b and 1.63b in operating costs. OpenAI subscribers can’t even cover their own cost of inference.

        • aski3252@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          however, they make quite a bit of profit

          Pretty sure they didn’t for a while. It’s the same approach as always. Operate at a loss, gain (nonpaying) users, maybe sell or use their data and slowly turn up whatever you are doing to make money (ads, fee).

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure, it took dropbox 9 years, Amazon took 7.

            OpenAI just turned 10, with profit nowhere in sight, and a path to profitability completely invisible.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thanks for the numbers, you were saying the subscriber percentage was embarrassing so I was curious about that rather than their fairly infamous losses.

          You’ve said OpenAI have about half the subscriber percentage of Dropbox, but if Dropbox is that profitable then that seems like they are doing particularly well and perhaps that subscriber percent is above average?

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Peope don’t usually compare OpenAI with Dropbox, but Dropbox isn’t particularly great with the free-to-paid converion rating. 2.6% is pretty bad, but they STILL manage to make money because what they do is pretty cheap on a per-user basis. They just host data, and most of that data isn’t really used much. Also, I don’t know if Dropbox is “that” profitable. All I could find is that their revenue exceeds their operating costs, but I don’t know if that covers R&D or marketing, which they probably spend a LOT of money on.

            Comparisons with YouTube and Spotify get thrown around a lot more, which convert around 5% and a whoppingly insane 36%, compared to OpenAI’s measly 1%. And both YouTube and Spotify actually make a LOT of money on their “free” users, via ads. OpenAI has no monetisation beyond subscribers, and they’re very bad at getting people to pay for their stuff.

            • Dave@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah that’s a fair point. I don’t think Dropbox does ads but the others I mentioned and the ones you mentioned all show/play ads for the free tier.

              I guess OpenAI will be pretty keen to get ads into their free tier too, once they run out of investors’ money.

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s like Google, Facebook, and Microsoft don’t exist.

      Let’s say it together, kids: “If the service is free, then you’re the…?”

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The companies are stroking it to get the valuable juice out, and then steal your orgasm too. All you’re left with drinking more water to sustain that.

          • ikt@aussie.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            tbf Spotify is easily the best subscription I’ve got, according to my wrapped I was listening to the equivalent of 82 days straight in the last year

            • tomkatt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Glad you’re enjoying it, that’s awesome. I used it a decade and more ago, but Spotify never worked out for me for a few reasons:

              • I discovered hi-fi music, have multiple good setups and for years Spotify was lower quality. It took them close to a decade to do FLAC quality.

              • I listen to a large variety of stuff from multiple countries, and Spotify would often lose rights to tracks I liked. At one point something like 10-15% of the music on my list disappeared.

              • I prefer to own my music in high quality, have bought a ton of albums and have around 1.2 TB of FLAC on my NAS.

              • I don’t like how artists get completely screwed on pay by Spotify.


              My home setup has multiple budget hi-fi setups with passive speakers and mini-amps, and a 5.1 system in my living room. I’ve got a mini-PC server that runs Lyrion with Bliss mix plugin, Plex (for PlexAmp), and AssetUPnP. I still have Qobuz for streaming and discovery (and it integrates in Lyrion to mix with my local collection), but prefer local music overall.

    • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The paid subscribers subsidize the unpaid ones. Sam Altman is a staunch socialist. Trump too, that communist-loving Mamdani fan. /s

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The paid subscribers subsidize the unpaid ones.

        Even for paying customers, inference alone costs OpenAI several times more than revenue.

    • realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly, having ~1.3% of paying users is fine considering they are using all the other users as free learning material for their models.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s really not, since all their models cost progressively more to run, and don’t bring in any more money.

        Remember, all those paying subscribers COST them money every month.