• fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    Not trying to be a Sony Bravia shill but I have two Sony Bravia XBR (X950G and X900H) TVs. Neither of these has ever attempted to show me an advertisement. They aren’t the newest versions nor the most expensive. I don’t include YT ads since those are YT generated.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    changing the TV’s DNS servers or disconnecting it from the internet entirely.

    Chiming in as an Australian budget VIDAA owner.

    I spotted that this TV attempts to query 8.8.8.8, regardless of your DNS settings. I implemented a port 53 (DNS) redirect so those queries get resolved by my local server.

    I also figured out which servers are serving up ads/tracking. I fired an email to Pete and got them added to his list. You’re welcome. I’m guessing a pi-hole would work with it.

    https://pgl.yoyo.org/adservers/serverlist.php

    I didn’t install the latest update, and probably never will. My TV contacts the unruly ACR servers, but the later firmware probably contacts nexxen.

    • French75@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      attempts to query 8.8.8.8, regardless of your DNS settings.

      Streaming box / stream app makers have been working around local DNS for a long time. Sometimes of course they’re assholes that want to do shitty things and do this to make interdiction harder. But sometimes there are legitimate reasons. Ones I remember… users who don’t really understand what they’re doing can be overly aggressive with blocking and block things that are necessary for a particular service (causing support problems). Sometimes the ISPs DNS servers have shit performance, and using a well known commercial provider like cloudflare or google can improve performance at scale. It’s not always evil.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      People like you help to make the internet a better place — which matters a lot to me, because one of my most desperately held beliefs is that it is possible to take the hopefulness of the early internet and combine it with the wisdom of the last few decades to produce a more robust kind of hope

    • patruelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Thank you for this. I will check later today on my own tv to see what its pulling in the background.

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Fuck that. heh.

    I use a TV for my computer monitor and it’s perfect. I do not use any of the TV features. And it pisses me off when something happens to lose my signal and it switches over into TV mode because it autoplays some free channel that spouts fascist nonsense. I have to poke around for the remote (which is always around but never close because I only need it every month or few months) so I can cut that shit off as soon as possible. heh

    Any video I need to watch happens via my computer, thanks, where I’m in control.

  • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I find myself wondering just how complicated TVS could actually be before it’s no longer possible to hijack the display signal that’s fed to the display

    Unlike with cars, TVS seem simple enough that a sufficiently motivated novice could modify a cheap TV to circumvent these bullshit features. If they ever started requiring internet connections to start or use these, i think enough people would be bothered by it that there would probably be a secondary market of modified hardware

    As with most enshitifications, the question will ultimately be one of complacency of the average consumer.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The basic thing is to get some product that YOU control and never allow the TV to be connected to the internet.

  • Turgid Sturgeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I had a 65" Hisense TV for just over a year, and a firmware update bricked it. It was stone dead, and Hisense wouldn’t even try to repair it. So I spent a little extra money and got a Samsung instead. And once it was set up, I turned off its wifi…just in case.

    Hisense can eat a bag o’ dicks.

    • ShankShill@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      My first 4K TV was a Samsung. The last update broke eARC making the Samsung home theater in a box thing I had much more inconvenient.

      My 2nd (free in a raffle) Samsung 4K TV connected to my WiFi without a password when a guest in the house casted a video to it despite on setup refusing to consent to any web things due to privacy concerns. Kinda interesting and concerning.

    • TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I haven’t bought a TV in a decade. What kind of setup is required? Why would it need internet access for that?

      • bzLem0n@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I let my Vizio TV connect for firmware updates as it has an issue that they’ve improved but I immediately turn off wifi and wipe the connection details right after.

    • fierysparrow89@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This. Have played with similar devices in the past and I was surprised how many of these devices are running standard Linux kernel with some custom engineered distros. Projects like Buildroot, OpenWRT, Busybox and a few others are what the vendors use to roll their own builds.

      A few of them agressively lock down the bootloaders in an attempt to (try to) prevent people from owning the device they’ve paid retail price for. Many don’t really bother. The good news is, that such measures are relatively easy for experts to circumvent and break down. This, of course, is not cheap, but needs to happen only once, often for more than a single model. Some kind of bounty-based system could provide incentive and financing for such efforts.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I believe some custom firmware for TVs exist, the issue is that they are relatively new pieces of tech, while routers have existed for a comparatively long time.

      • HexaBack@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        cfw on smart TVs would be difficult in the first place due to the TVs’ heavily TiVo-ized nature (pun not intended)

  • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I have a Hisense that I bought late last year and have never connected it to the internet (I stream everything through my PS5) and boyhowdy does that TV take every chance it gets to let me know I’m not connected lol

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I bought my last TV about 7 years ago. I got a “small” 38" TV. As I was checking out, the cashier asked me if I’d rather upgrade to a larger model from the same brand with smart features for 10 dollars less. I flat out told him ‘no’ and that was probably the best decision I made that year.

      • melfie@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yes, and no. For example, my Samsung TV makes me wait while it tries to recognize whatever I have plugged into the HDMI port, as opposed, oh I don’t know, just displaying the fucking signal being fed to it. Annoying as hell.

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Sadly more and more TV’s will now require you to connect to the Internet, even when you just use HDMI

        • _g_be@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          My new LG didn’t require it, but the settings menu and ‘home’ screen nag about lack of connectivity.

          “Why did you buy a smart TV if you didn’t want the smart features” brother, it was the best tv in that price range and few true dumb ones exist in that range. IMO the smart features should be considered optional but I guess these companies don’t agree

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Ive had LG, Vizio, TCL, and Samsung TVs (still have all but Vizio) and haven’t ran into one that requires internet yet, not to say that some manufacturers haven’t/wouldn’t do this at some point.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s true that things are worse on a cheap tv but even if you buy a $5000+ flagship model it will still have advertising baked into the os

      • monotremata@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Most of the “commercial” TVs, the ones intended for businesses, don’t have this. They also don’t have streaming services and whatnot not built in. They’re just a display with a few inputs, and maybe a tuner.

        • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          that’s true but they’re more expensive, sometimes prohibitively so. If you want an oled panel they’re basically unfeasible, especially if you want a larger panel >55”

  • Atlas_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    IF YOU BUY ANY TV, DO NOT CONNECT IT TO THE INTERNET.

    Televisions were never meant to be smart devices. There’s no reason your screen should have software of its own. That would be like your face having a mind of its own.

    Ummm, <eldrich horror rant text>

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Cell modems are getting cheaper and cheaper, it’s only a matter of time before cheap smart TVs will flood the market with always-on telemetry and intrusive personalized ads.

        • jmf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Like the other comment said, if you drive a car made after 2014, don’t bother. You drive a rolling tracking beacon regardless of what you do with your smart devices…

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Until a few years later when all the used TVs have cell modems. The same thing is already happening in the used car market, it’s getting harder and harder to find a reliable vehicle that doesn’t have a cell modem and a long T&C that let’s them spy on you.

    • ManosTheHandsOfFate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I haven’t experience this myself but I’ve read that some newer TV’s are forcing you to connect to the internet before you can do anything else.